Classic SeaCraft Community

Classic SeaCraft Community (http://www.classicseacraft.com/community/index.php)
-   General (http://www.classicseacraft.com/community/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   seacraft versus mako (http://www.classicseacraft.com/community/showthread.php?t=16345)

Scott 02-20-2006 04:35 PM

Re: seacraft versus mako
 
There was a 23 SeaCraft CC going through a face lift that was converted to a "Semi Savage". He had a deck put in above the casting platform. It ran from gunwale to gunwale and followed the shape of the existing cap. The boat ended up in MD and was a work of art. Unfortunately I have no pictures as this was pre-classicseacraft...I dont think Digital cameras were even hot at that point !! Was a long project ...the console was even sent to Florida to get fit for a T-top

ocuyler 02-20-2006 04:41 PM

Re: seacraft versus mako
 
With your permission, Capt. Chuck - I'll be direct. SeaCraft is the better boat. I suggest you send your $7,000 to Rear Admiral Trayder and we will collectively choose the right boat for you. Please add the $25 service fee...

John R 02-20-2006 05:39 PM

Re: seacraft versus mako
 
Quote:

Quote:

That is what I would do (and would be what I do next)

Should we plan on seeing your 23 CC for sale soon?

Dunno. As I bought the boat before being laid off for ten months and finally working at 60% of previous pay, it might be worth finishing her, running a season, and flipping to a lower cost cuddy/Savage. The other possibility is that if I go into business fully for myself I may need to flip it and go with a tin boat or a 'yak for a few years :eek: (or take more trips in yours and Blizzards ;)

RS 02-20-2006 08:55 PM

Re: seacraft versus mako
 
Quote:

or take more trips in yours and Blizzards ;)

You're always welcome ;)

Ed 02-20-2006 11:59 PM

Re: seacraft versus mako
 
Tommy-

I own a 1991 Mako 231. It is a solid, well built boat. It has 19 degrees of deadrise at the transom...where as the older versions had somewhere around 14 degrees. If you're seriously considering one...go with one from the late 1980's to early 1990's.

In my opinion, the Seacraft has the following advantages: better ride in the chop, higher resale value, thicker hull lamination and superior stringer construction. It also has a more attractive shear line.

To the Mako's credit...it is very dry and more stable while at drift. Plus, as you mentioned...they can be had for somewhat less money (depending on the condition of the hull)

In the end, there is no perfect hull....each one is a compromise.My suggestion is to go with what you can afford and then fish it like crazy.

Sleeto 02-21-2006 08:08 AM

Re: seacraft versus mako
 
Any time, John. It would be an honor.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:09 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft