![]() |
Re: Why are POTTER 23 CC's so revered?
Hey Sandy,
Layup....check this dude out: 1973...no gloves, no tyvek, no respirator :o http://www.classicseacraft.com/broch...edium/0001.jpg Back then it went in thick and by hand....bare hand :D bfox....good luck with the boat. You will love a SeaCraft of any vintage or style :rolleyes: |
Re: Why are POTTER 23 CC's so revered?
I posted this on THT with your other thread. The potter 23 has a far superior transom design with the large splashwell vs. the low open tracker 23 transom with the wooden gate. Also some mid-80's trackers came out of a mold with a known hook in the hull. If you do a search for "Hook" on this site you will find the info.
Large Open Transom from Tracker: (Please note the homemade splash guard) http://i162.photobucket.com/albums/t...100_1975-1.jpg VS. Potter transom http://www.wellcraftv20.com/gallery/...240_Medium.jpg |
Re: Why are POTTER 23 CC's so revered?
I believe it was SpiderCrab with his infinite wisdom and unmatched communicational abilities that once said and I quote.
http://www.theboatzone.com/albums/cs01/sam_1.jpg ITS BETTER FELT THAT TELT FellowShip . Just for the Grins :D :D :D :D Official 23 SF Antique Classic SeaCraft Owner |
Re: Why are POTTER 23 CC's so revered?
[QUOTE]
Hey Sandy, Layup....check this dude out: 1973...no gloves, no tyvek, no respirator :o http://www.classicseacraft.com/broch...edium/0001.jpg Must be a magic hat. Even backing off 50 % on the MEK doesn`t buy much time down here. Maybe I need bigger brushes and a magic hat? |
Re: There is no substitute for a SeaCraft.
Soooo True
|
Re: There is no substitute for a SeaCraft.
It beats, lotsa Vroom with only a little Boom!
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:32 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft