Classic SeaCraft Community

Classic SeaCraft Community (http://www.classicseacraft.com/community/index.php)
-   Performance (http://www.classicseacraft.com/community/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   Transom height for SC20 Master Angler (http://www.classicseacraft.com/community/showthread.php?t=23411)

Chaser 12-03-2011 10:33 PM

Transom height for SC20 Master Angler
 
Hello all,

I recently acquired a 1978 SeaCraft Master Angler 20. I'm excited to get it back on the water. The boat has been sitting out in the weather for about ten years, so its in kinda rough shape. I plan to do a modest restoration including fixing the decks where the core is rotten and soft, topside paint, and re-power. I have a rigging and boat shop so I'm doing all the work myself, except for the outboard.

When I got the boat, it had a 1985 Evinrude 235hp outboard on it. It was supposedly re-built some time back and in OK shape. Well, turns out it was shot it had been overheated and is basically scrap. I'm going to put a re-built Mariner 175 on it instead, being built at a local shop.

The boat currently has a 20" transom. The motor can be built with either 20" or 25" transom height, its my call I just have to let the mechanic know. The transom is actually in very good shape, with no rot or soft spots at all, so it doesn't need repair. But since the boat needs a bunch of other fiberglass work I'm thinking about raising the transom up to get the powerhead further away from the water.

The waterline on the boat has been raised I think as a result of the weight of the large outboard. It also has splash plates and some other devices to keep from being swamped. Obviously it sat stern down and had problems getting swamped. Does anyone have a recommendation as to whether the 20" stern height is too low? I've searched around the forum a bit and haven't found exactly the answer I'm looking for.

I'm spending a bunch of time and money to get the boat in good shape. Its a great boat and from everything I've read here I think I'll be really happy with it. I don't want to go through all this work only to find out I really should have raised the transom when I had the chance.

Whats the advice?

htillman 12-03-2011 11:18 PM

I recommend raising the transom while you are getting the boat in shape. If you dont, you will probably wish you had later down the road.

McGillicuddy 12-04-2011 04:01 AM

I don't think there is a sane person on this forum that wouldn't raise their transom from 20" to 25"given the skills, space, and materials. Not sure what year your mariner is but if its in the 360# class like mariner magnum, etc. you'll have a great ride when your done;)

bly 12-04-2011 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chaser (Post 196501)
Hello all,

I recently acquired a 1978 SeaCraft Master Angler 20. I'm excited to get it back on the water. The boat has been sitting out in the weather for about ten years, so its in kinda rough shape. I plan to do a modest restoration including fixing the decks where the core is rotten and soft, topside paint, and re-power. I have a rigging and boat shop so I'm doing all the work myself, except for the outboard.

When I got the boat,

it had a 1985 Evinrude 235hp outboard??????? on it. You think the transom is in good shape after this was hanging on it?


It was supposedly re-built some time back and in OK shape. Well, turns out it was shot it had been overheated and is basically scrap. I'm going to put a re-built Mariner 175 on it instead, being built at a local shop.

The boat currently has a 20" transom. The motor can be built with either 20" or 25" transom height, its my call I just have to let the mechanic know. The transom is actually in very good shape, with no rot or soft spots at all, so it doesn't need repair. But since the boat needs a bunch of other fiberglass work I'm thinking about raising the transom up to get the powerhead further away from the water.

{{{{{{{{The waterline on the boat has been raised I think as a result of the weight of the large outboard. It also has splash plates and some other devices to keep from being swamped. }}}}}}}}}}}
{{{ Obviously it sat stern down and had problems getting swamped.}}}}} }}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}


Does anyone have a recommendation as to whether the 20" stern height is too low? I've searched around the forum a bit and haven't found exactly the answer I'm looking for.

I'm spending a bunch of time and money to get the boat in good shape. Its a great boat and from everything I've read here I think I'll be really happy with it. I don't want to go through all this work only to find out I really should have raised the transom when I had the chance.

Whats the advice?

My recommendation would be that if you want a safe boat to go to a 25 in transom. If you use the original transom. Test it before you put the boat in the water. While the boat is on the trailer tilt the motor about a 1/3 to 1/2 up and stand on cav plate area with out breaking your leg or head. Bounce a little and have someone else watch the transom around the motor mount. If No flexing then the transom is OK. On a 78 original transom I doubt it. Especially after having a 235 HP on it. It is getting hard to find 20 inch motors new that are not clamp on low HP.

Chaser 12-04-2011 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bly (Post 196506)
My recommendation would be that if you want a safe boat to go to a 25 in transom. If you use the original transom. Test it before you put the boat in the water. While the boat is on the trailer tilt the motor about a 1/3 to 1/2 up and stand on cav plate area with out breaking your leg or head. Bounce a little and have someone else watch the transom around the motor mount. If No flexing then the transom is OK. On a 78 original transom I doubt it. Especially after having a 235 HP on it. It is getting hard to find 20 inch motors new that are not clamp on low HP.

I do a lot of work on boats and yes the transom is structurally sound. It was a bit of a surprise what good shape it is in, but also created this problem... If the transom needed replacement it would be a no brainer to raise it to 25", but since it doesn't need any repair, I don't know about cutting into a good part to change things around. The reason would be to give the boat better sea keeping abilities.

floorboy 12-04-2011 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chaser (Post 196512)
The reason would be to give the boat better sea keeping abilities.

That would be reason enough for me as long as your working on it.

scnewbie 12-04-2011 01:55 PM

Raise the transom. My SC was redone in 05 by previous owner, new pourable transom, but left at 20 inches. Now I want to enclose and bracket due to water pouring in through the notch bc of heavier four stroke. You won't regret raising it, but you will regret not raising it.

bly 12-04-2011 07:59 PM

Since the transom is that sound and you do not want to cut a good transom.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chaser (Post 196512)
I do a lot of work on boats and yes the transom is structurally sound. It was a bit of a surprise what good shape it is in, but also created this problem... If the transom needed replacement it would be a no brainer to raise it to 25", but since it doesn't need any repair, I don't know about cutting into a good part to change things around. The reason would be to give the boat better sea keeping abilities.

What about a Jack plate type permanent aluminum 4 or 6 inch set back . So that you can raise the transom to 25 inches with out doing it structurally. . Or a full splash well with the 20 inch transom. We are only concerned because the 20 ft sea craft hull will allow you to fish in shall we say sportier conditions then most 20 ft boats. Most would never fish any other 20 ft boat in the conditions that you normally see sea crafts fishing. That is why we go out of the way to modernize or standardize the 30, 40 or even 50 + year old best riding boats in their class. If as you said the water line was raised very high? Just putting the propper size engine on there does not mean that the floatation foam is not wet and with the 20 inch transom you could still have a problem waiting to happen. We are only trying to help from our own past experiences. I think I bought my first 20 ft sea craft in the late 1970s and that boat had all the cap rivets coming loose to the point of water shooting up the side of the hull under the rub rail and between the hull and cap into the shelf area next to the forward raised fish box. I could have blown the whole cap off into my face when I was young and crazy.

Chaser 12-05-2011 10:50 AM

Thanks for all the input everyone. It sounds like I should do it.

A bit of a disclaimer I don't fish! I like this boat though for its ability to handle a bigger sea state than other 20 foot boats. We plan to use the boat as a chase boat and support vessel for my business and the racing program I run, so its got to be able to handle conditions that might be considered "sporting" for some...

pianewman 12-05-2011 11:27 AM

Wow! In that case, raising the transom is a very good idea. You might also want to talk to Don Herman, Hermco, and have him make a splashwell for your motor well. He's in the process of creating a mold for earlier 20' CCs. I believe you have a different transom, but he still might be able to help you out.
Even with a 25" transom, you still run the risk of water intrusion under certain conditions, and the splashwell (a SC design) is critical.
Good luck with your boat.

workinpr0gress 12-05-2011 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bly (Post 196517)
What about a Jack plate type permanent aluminum 4 or 6 inch set back . So that you can raise the transom to 25 inches with out doing it structurally. . Or a full splash well with the 20 inch transom.

That is what I would be thinking. Jackplate, splashwell. Jackplates are a useful, beneficial toy.

When my transom starts going I'm going to to cut my bracket down to 18" and widen the chamber. Then it's getting a hydraulic jackplate.

Seacraft84 12-05-2011 02:28 PM

Chaser.. I have a 77 MA and when I bought the boat the PO glassed two 2x6's together and cut the sides of the motor well out and put the 2x6's on top of the cut out for transom. The 2x6's went across the transom on the inside for additional support. Glassed the 2x6 to the interior of transom(access through boxes at stern) and glass to existing transom cut out. Makes for an additional 5" or so. Mine was still pretty strurdy, but I redid the boat this past winter and closed the transom in.

Manual or hydraulic jackplates just add more weight to the stern. Especially if you keep the 20" transom.

workinpr0gress 12-05-2011 03:48 PM

I agree about weight when it comes to 35-60 lb. hydraulic jackplates, but the fixed plates are light, 11-12 lbs. Maybe having a pair of 40lb batteries under the console would help offset the weight and setback.
http://m.westmarine.com/aHR0cDovL3d3...3D#description
That said a 20" transom isn't ideal.

Chaser 12-05-2011 04:38 PM

I checked into the jack plate idea and I am not convinced it accomplishes what I want to do. It would get the powerhead out of the water further, which is good, but it does nothing for the actual transom height and keeping out water, I would still have to install some sort of splash guard for this purpose.

I talked with one of my tech's this morning and we have a plan to raise the transom. Shouldn't be too much work and my feeling from the input here is that if I don't I'll wish I had.

Thanks for all the prompt feedback on this! I'll be sure to take some pics of the process and post here when the boat is complete!

workinpr0gress 12-05-2011 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chaser (Post 196539)
I checked into the jack plate idea and I am not convinced it accomplishes what I want to do. It would get the powerhead out of the water further, which is good, but it does nothing for the actual transom height and keeping out water, I would still have to install some sort of splash guard for this purpose.

I talked with one of my tech's this morning and we have a plan to raise the transom. Shouldn't be too much work and my feeling from the input here is that if I don't I'll wish I had.

Thanks for all the prompt feedback on this! I'll be sure to take some pics of the process and post here when the boat is complete!

Many a person has scabbed wood right on top of an existing "good" transom without issue. I would want to get away from that 20" transom too if at all possible. Definitely look into that tub style splashwell that the guys are going googly for. Hermco's doing it up for some guys.

Which year 175 Mariner you going with? That old 235 weighed about 400 lbs. I believe.

Chaser 12-05-2011 06:59 PM

The Mariner is a 1989.

Our plan is to build a rectangular section of plywood cored glass that matches the existing transoms construction, and is the size necessary to fill the transom area and raise it 5". We will glue that in place with Pro-Set epoxy. We'll then bevel back the surrounding outside skin of the transom about 6" and tab the part in. We'll also bevel back the inside of the transom all the way to the bottom of the well and along the sides of the well and tab the part into that structure also.

Blue_Heron 12-05-2011 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chaser (Post 196545)
The Mariner is a 1989.

Our plan is to build a rectangular section of plywood cored glass that matches the existing transoms construction, and is the size necessary to fill the transom area and raise it 5". We will glue that in place with Pro-Set epoxy. We'll then bevel back the surrounding outside skin of the transom about 6" and tab the part in. We'll also bevel back the inside of the transom all the way to the bottom of the well and along the sides of the well and tab the part into that structure also.

That sounds like a good approach. As long as your bevel is at least a 12:1 ratio to your laminate thickness, and 6" should be plenty, your seam should be very strong. I would use epoxy resin for the tabbing for its superior secondary bond, but some guys here might consider that overkill.

Dave

Chaser 12-05-2011 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blue_Heron (Post 196546)
That sounds like a good approach. As long as your bevel is at least a 12:1 ratio to your laminate thickness, and 6" should be plenty, your seam should be very strong. I would use epoxy resin for the tabbing for its superior secondary bond, but some guys here might consider that overkill.

Dave

We use epoxy for everything except where it is prohibited by class rules. Its not overkill in my book, just better boatbuilding!

GodsReel 12-08-2011 12:38 AM

what kind of race program? kitesurfing? just wondering because that's what i do when it get's to rough for my seacraft.

Chaser 12-08-2011 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GodsReel (Post 196585)
what kind of race program? kitesurfing? just wondering because that's what i do when it get's to rough for my seacraft.

Sailboat racing program. We manage a 65' racer/cruiser, a Melges 24, and our own F18 catamaran. And possibly soon an Open 50 canting keel race boat. There are plenty of times that we are on the water when its not very comfortable for anyone in a small powerboat! Also we will run Race Committee from the boat including setting and retrieving race marks.

Must sound like sacrilege to all the fishermen on this forum! I hope I am not banished!:)

SteveH 12-08-2011 01:13 PM

The 1978 master anger that my father and I had for about twenty years had a 25" transom. Definitely, the way to go. we never had an issue with water instrusion. We had a 175 merc, black max, on it. It was a perfect match for the boat in my opinion.

Chaser 12-08-2011 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteveH (Post 196588)
The 1978 master anger that my father and I had for about twenty years had a 25" transom. Definitely, the way to go. we never had an issue with water instrusion. We had a 175 merc, black max, on it. It was a perfect match for the boat in my opinion.

Sounds like I am on the right track then! Now the only problem is how to manage all our billable jobs and not get side tracked working on my personal projects. I think some of my guys are getting tired of me talking about and working on the SC while they are stuck outside in the cold!

DonV 12-08-2011 03:44 PM

"I think some of my guys are getting tired of me talking about and working on the SC while they are stuck outside in the cold!"

TS.......

eggsuckindog 12-09-2011 10:26 PM

Frankly with all the other stuff and a good transom I would leave that until later. I have a MA with a 20" transom and a 200 merc @ 410lbs. My PO has put 2 5" starboard splash guards either side of the engine and I have only once gotten water over the transom. I also have a factory door that mounts across the splashwell to keep any water in the splashwell as it has 2 1" drains back there - that was the original design. If you look you will see the 1" recess built into the the front of the splashwell that you could easily build a 2 piece hinged door - frankly I have put mine on twice and wished I hadn't bothered.

The original SeaCrafts were offshore boats but with 20" transoms a door across the splashwell was always there - my 18 had one and even the 23 with the large splashwell still had a hinged door. If a wave comes in it goes right back out the scuppers and never enters the cockpit, the 18 fishing West Palm with 3 guys the system worked just fine when getting fish on board with everybody near the stern you'd get waves back there. Those spalsh guards do work well I must say, the boat was used on the east coast but they work great grouper fishing in the gulf too - never put the door on.

Note- There is a bilge access panel back there that MUST be sealed well - only place water can get into the bilge and the cause of most sinkings.

Chaser 12-11-2011 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eggsuckindog (Post 196598)
Frankly with all the other stuff and a good transom I would leave that until later. I have a MA with a 20" transom and a 200 merc @ 410lbs. My PO has put 2 5" starboard splash guards either side of the engine and I have only once gotten water over the transom. I also have a factory door that mounts across the splashwell to keep any water in the splashwell as it has 2 1" drains back there - that was the original design. If you look you will see the 1" recess built into the the front of the splashwell that you could easily build a 2 piece hinged door - frankly I have put mine on twice and wished I hadn't bothered.

The original SeaCrafts were offshore boats but with 20" transoms a door across the splashwell was always there - my 18 had one and even the 23 with the large splashwell still had a hinged door. If a wave comes in it goes right back out the scuppers and never enters the cockpit, the 18 fishing West Palm with 3 guys the system worked just fine when getting fish on board with everybody near the stern you'd get waves back there. Those spalsh guards do work well I must say, the boat was used on the east coast but they work great grouper fishing in the gulf too - never put the door on.

Note- There is a bilge access panel back there that MUST be sealed well - only place water can get into the bilge and the cause of most sinkings.

My boat has a couple of stainless splashguards either side of the motor that mount on the transom. There is also a "door" for the forward end of the splashwell but it is not hinged, it is screwed into place and sealed with sealant, or at least it WAS, and will be again when I put the boat back together... The access hatch for the bilge will be well sealed when the boat is put back together.

I'm still set on the 25" transom height. Maybe its just me worrying, but I prefer having the motor further out of the water and having a little more buffer for the waves.

Thanks for the input.

oldbluesplayer 12-14-2011 06:19 PM

another vote for go 25"
 
Chaser, I redid my 20 ft. Seafari transom a few years back, and because I had a good condition 20" motor, I stayed with the 20" transom. I have been out in the rough more than a few times where I regret that decision. Even in fairly calm conditions, backing down on a fish, I get water over the transom, enough that I ended up building my own splashwell box, a rough copy of the Sea Craft original the guys were talking about.

I'll give you another strong vote for going 25", and would even go 30" if you could do it to the motor.

Seas blow up at funny times, sometimes with un-funny results.

that's my .02, anyways.

Merry Christmas,

Bill

irish 02-01-2012 05:11 PM

The modern era SeaCraft 20's have 25" transoms. I have a 2001 w a 150 Etec. That is the setup that I would reccommend.

gofastsandman 02-01-2012 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chaser (Post 196586)
Sailboat racing program. We manage a 65' racer/cruiser, a Melges 24, and our own F18 catamaran. And possibly soon an Open 50 canting keel race boat. There are plenty of times that we are on the water when its not very comfortable for anyone in a small powerboat! Also we will run Race Committee from the boat including setting and retrieving race marks.

Must sound like sacrilege to all the fishermen on this forum! I hope I am not banished!:)



Build me an igloo with slushies from the Circle K.

We have some puffer people here.

I`ve caught a lot of fish whilst heeling.

Cheers,
GFS

Chaser 06-02-2012 10:05 PM

Chaser
 
1 Attachment(s)
Chaser on the beach near our home in Anacortes.

Chaser 06-02-2012 10:09 PM

2 Attachment(s)
Some low res pics with the Blackberry.

Chaser 06-02-2012 11:13 PM

2 Attachment(s)
Just a couple more

strick 06-03-2012 02:31 AM

I have some cousins in Bellingham that commercial fish. Thats a nice work boat you have there!

strick

FishStretcher 06-03-2012 08:22 AM

I have the same boat with a 370 lb four stroke and a 60 lb kicker, both batteries and fuel tank moved under the console, and a 20" transom. Yours is nicer than mine!

Someone mentioned Bellingham? (WA?) I would go with the 25" transom. I have the splashwell gate that eggsuckingdog mentioned and it works, but it is an annoyance. The motor, when tilted all the way up, will hit it. Some master anglers have a custom or later gate with a "dent" in it for a tilted powerhead.

TooFly 06-03-2012 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chaser (Post 203484)
Chaser on the beach near our home in Anacortes.

Great pic!

Chaser 06-03-2012 02:26 PM

We've been using the boat now for a couple of months. Been out in everything from flat calm to a 3 foot chop in 25 knots of wind. In the lumpy stuff I was amazed how well the boat ran. At first I was unsure if we could get up on plane going upwind, I was just driving through the waves at low speed, but then hit the throttle and she jumped up on plane and just ate up the waves! It was super dry and very comfortable, and you could feel the power of that 175 just pushing the boat from wavetop to wavetop. It was like mogul skiing. Once on plane the boat never fell down into the troughs! The only time we got wet at all was when we had to stop to set marks.

Also did a 70+ mile tour of the Islands for my mom on mothers day. All day cruising with 5 people and a full tank of gas, and the boat cruised along at 25 knots at 4200 rpm. Still not sure how much fuel we used as the gauge appears to be inaccurate below 1/4 tank... (ask me how I know!) I just bought a Floscan which I plan to install to measure fuel burn.

We've done 5 nights of Race Committee work for the Yacht Club, setting and retrieving marks and staying on station to start and finish boats. The marks in the pic's are our racing marks, and the white rack is the flag rack which we use for signal flags.

I'm very glad I raised the transom. Thanks for all the advice from the forum. I'll post some more pics of the work I did.

Chaser 06-03-2012 02:44 PM

5 Attachment(s)
Transom before and after extension. I did this by building an insert out of 4 sections of 6mm marine ply laminated together with epoxy, then glassed over top with 6 layers each side of 1708 biaxial glass, also with epoxy. Then the insert was glued into the transom cutout, and galssed over with another 6 layers either side of 1708, wrapped over the top, and also run up the corners of the motor well, to further re-enforce the transom to the well. Its pretty f'ing strong now!

Also drilled out the motor well drain holes and glued in fiberglass tube to replace the plastic press fit drains that were there. Very clean looking once complete. I also did this to the bait well and cooler drains. Next winter I plan to do the same upgrade to the cockpit drains.

Deck re-core with rotten core removed, and with core laid in, before glass. The deck at the bow section was totally rotten, and got completely re-cored, and there were some smaller sections on the starboard side that were also done.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft