![]() |
And now, the not-so-good news
I just pulled my lower unit, and my bearing carrier has shifted backwards about 1/16", which is what caused me to not have any reverse this past weekend.
And boy, let me tell you, it is not easy to anchor in a tight line of boats, in a current, with only 6-8' of clearance to the sides, without reverse. especially with everyone there evaluating your seamanship as you approach. THAT could be a whole 'nother thread. |
Re: And now, the not-so-good news
Good luck, thats why I spent a day and a half getting my reverse but you did great never even noticed.
|
Re: And now, the not-so-good news
"especially with everyone there evaluating your seamanship as you approach" :D :D :D
|
Re: And now, the not-so-good news
We ended up doing a complete rebuild with a new (old) gearcase as the threads on mine were too far gone. No nose cone on the new case. We put in new seals & bushings, new bearings, new pinion gear, new clutch dog cam & pin.
I figure I lost 2-3 mph with the lack of a nosecone. I actually ran 4-5 mph less, but I figure higher air temps & lower air density of summer accounts for half of that. Top speed on GPS was 47 mph at 6050 rpms straight downwind in 20kt wind and a light to moderate chop, trimmed out and surfacing the prop at that speed. Here are the stats: Boat is a '72 Seafari Motor is a '91 Mercury 2.4L 150 Xr4 carb model reman'd to produce about 190 hp w/ 20" shaft. Fuel burn at WOT was 15.8 gph. Gear ratio is 1.75 to 1 (off a Merc 3.0L) Prop is custom PowerTech 15"D x 16.5"P Hull has fresh Slickote bottom paint. Carried one person and about 20 gallons fuel. |
Re: And now, the not-so-good news
Hey Frank im not a numbers guy but the numbers sound better than most posted the last few weeks.
|
Re: And now, the not-so-good news
It runs well. The engine was balanced to within 4 grams of reciprocating weight when remanufactured in '02. Best performance ever was on a cold day using my old handheld GPS, showing 46 kts, or 53 mph, using the same prop behind a Hydro-Flow nosecone.
I've seen a '78 20' CC reach a true and sustained 53 kts (61 mph)with a 2.5L 200 Merc on a jackplate with a nosecone/low-water pickup from Bob's in Ruskin, turning a 24"P overhub "chopper". Slow out of the hole, though. And I know the 23' Seavette with twin 260hp 5.7L Mercruisers was capable of 68 mph, and with twin 235 Evinrudes, in '84 a SeaVette I was riding in hit an indicated 73 mph on a CMP/Keller speedo. (Very accurate water pressure speedo) SeaCrafts can be very fast. They were designed that way. :D Yours can be, too. |
Re: And now, the not-so-good news
twin merc's in a 23 seavette.....is that the same basic hull as the 23' sceptre/CC?? If it can handle that weight I'm less concerned about the weight of twin O/Bs on a bracket on my Tsunami....???
|
Re: And now, the not-so-good news
yep. same hull.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:03 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft