[ocuyler]

Fishstu,

This has been debated on this forum for a couple of years. I can't speak for everyone, but I believe the consensus was that, first, all the hulls are basically the same. Until this recent issue of a very late model hull being defective, there are few or no occurences of hull failure in any hulls, Potter, CSY or Tracker.

Personally, I own a 1989 23CC (Tracker) and a 1971 21 Seafari (Potter). The difference is in fit and finish and quality of the materials. On the older models it's kind of a moot point as most hardware, wiring, etc. is replaced with it's current counter-part by serious restorers. Most hulls pre-1990 will require some degree of repair or restoration anyway, just like ANY boat of it's era.

To answer your question, a "Potter" hull is a terrific hull and you get to say it's a Potter. I guarantee if you close your eyes, your ass will not know the difference and either will the water.