Re: seacraft versus mako
Tommy-
I own a 1991 Mako 231. It is a solid, well built boat. It has 19 degrees of deadrise at the transom...where as the older versions had somewhere around 14 degrees. If you're seriously considering one...go with one from the late 1980's to early 1990's.
In my opinion, the Seacraft has the following advantages: better ride in the chop, higher resale value, thicker hull lamination and superior stringer construction. It also has a more attractive shear line.
To the Mako's credit...it is very dry and more stable while at drift. Plus, as you mentioned...they can be had for somewhat less money (depending on the condition of the hull)
In the end, there is no perfect hull....each one is a compromise.My suggestion is to go with what you can afford and then fish it like crazy.
|