View Single Post
  #8  
Old 03-06-2006, 06:35 PM
abl1111 abl1111 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: long island, ny
Posts: 1,053
Default Re: 1974 23 SF I/O Desirability


I have a 23' Tsunami w/ a 5.7 I/O and a Bravo 3 - SWEET ride ! The I/O box is no problem for me, although if it were not there it would be even better. With regard to maintenance - w/ an I/O you can still do some DIY maintenance - the new O/B's are not even for the mechanically inclined.

So, let's see - more cockpit room w/ an o/b. Less aft weight - could be a pro or a con ? O/B better shallow water access. O/B - do not have to keep the outdrive in the water (corrosion). O/B good fuel consumption too. O/B more difficult to work on, I/O easier, and I/O handles much better - especially Bravo 3, I/O very fuel efficient - and quiet ( a buddy of mine has a Yamaha 250 HPDI on a 25' Parker - it is loud ! I/O closed transom.

Overall the only thing that really bothers me about having an I/O is that I hate leaving the drive in the water for the season. And, I have to watch out for certain shallow spots. However, I feel that the weight of the motor, centered nice and low, gives me a very nice smooth, dry ride.

At the end of the day, you can't go wrong either way. I was always an O/B guy for all the obvious reasons but now that I own an I/O - something I SWORE I would never do - I'm happy with it !

Good luck
Reply With Quote