I followed up the rant with an additional typo. It really bugs me when fuel flow data or stats are off. The article on the Jupiter 38 was good but again, the fuel range columns were off. Way off. When I pointed that out again to the editor, he followed up stating the I was wrong because it's based on 90% of fuel tank capacity leaving a little for margin.
Perhaps if he got his head out of his you know what, opened to page 42 the total range of the Jupiter was 1 mile. And that was at all rpm's.
I await his response.
