[BigLew]

Thank you, Jim. I take your points very seriously.

MPI vs. Normal aspiration is attractive and is definitely in the mix for a couple of reasons. First, it seems to be easier and quicker starting, not to mention more efficient in general. It also provides more and higher HP options for about the same money. My one real hang up is on-site repairabilty. I have esperienced sudden engine failure in the past and often it has been repairable on the spot. Stuck thottle plate, water acculmulation in the float chamber showing up as you crank up the rpms - out of close range to a dock, etc. MPI does not seem to be the same situation or maybe its just my lack of familiarty with it-NONE!

Your performance numbers are of interest. Clearly there is some expectation of increase on my part. I was thinking that going from 260 to say 330 would put me in the 26-28 rrange on cruise and the higher 30's, say 37-39 wot. Am I being unrealistic? The cruise number is the more important to me overall.

PS

Jim, I totally agree with a new engine; from fuel line to batteries to bell housing! The drive is up for grabs. It is rock solid as it sits and has a stellar history. That said, for the right reasons and the right $$$ it may be in the mix as well.


I'd also like to hear from others on this as well. Say "Entourage", " Water Rat" or someone else runnig a Scepter I/O set up?

I do know one thing. Being up north here and dealing with the local area, i.e. the Merrimac River inlet and a LOT of 2+ ft. chop as I do, I will not be going to an outboard. It is a personal thing and I just like the weight being down low in the bilge.