Re: Potter vs. non-Potter hulls
I like the timeline, Rich. I think the comments regarding the 21 are fairly accurate too. Mine seems much more closely related to the 23 than the 20 MA.
This is very interesting indeed. Thanks everyone for the replies! [img]images/icons/smile.gif[/img]
[ July 25, 2003, 04:30 PM: Message edited by: ole yeller ]
|