![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Need a little help guys. I am pretty torn trying to decide which outboard to put on a 23 w/bracket. Leaning towards an etec. I might have the option to get a 300 hpdi, just wondering if the horror stories are as bad as they sound? Also have the option for a 225 03 Yamaha 4 stroke. It seems they had issues as well. Not to mention I am not sure if the power is a great fit. Would love to hear some current feedback on newer engines. I have nothing against older engines, but really looking to purchase something 03 & up. Thanks guys!
__________________
Scituate Mass 1976 SeaCraft SF23 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a 225 eTEC on a bracket on my 1998 23cc. I love the motor. I got it new in 2006. I have put near 1000 hours on it without many issues. I have recently had an injector fail but it was fixed on the warranty. Not much negative to say. I run it hard and it doesn't fail. I run about 40MPH with the boat loaded and 150g fuel. Boat has a Ttop and I carry around 15g of freshwater not to mention 2-3 large people, more ice than someone would want and way too many fishing rods....
I could do a little better if I play with the prop, but that is another story. Also, I would suggest going with the XD100 oil if you run long days and will have a small oil tank. The motor can be set up for various grades of oil. XD100 being the most costly per gallon but burning the least. I can burn near 100g of fuel per gallon of oil. With my small oil tank (I think it is 1.5g) I avoid needing to refill it while fishing. I am not sure what BRP is offering for incentive but when I bought mine it was a 7 year protection plan. I know they have recently offered a upgraded gauge package with the motor purchase. If you are looking at a used eTEC you can transfer the warranty so it may be a plus to find one that has the 7 year plan. Sorry, I got a little long winded here but hopefully this helps some. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That motor sounds like it pushes your setup very well, a lttle above what my expectation would be.
__________________
Thank goodness that in the scheme of things you are broke, powerlesss and inconsequential, because with the shortsighted alternatives and idealogy you have you'd be much worse than those you complain about. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The eTECs are strong motors. With that, I top out at 33 knots. By my math that puts me at 38 MPH. Trimmed properly this is pretty repeatable. I actually expected to get a little more. My issue is with the time it takes to get on plane, It does not jump up like I may want. It is not horrible but not instant either.
The 225 eTEC is a good strong motor and handles the 23 well. When it comes time to repower I am looking to go with a 250 or 300 but those will not gain much. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would look into a 250 or 300 suzuki (4stroke). If you had the floor raised and the transom strengthened up I would go for the 300. My father had a 300 on his 2000 25' Seacraft and it got awesome gas mileage. Not a speed demon, but efficient. Cruising about 3.0mpg. I bet it would push a 23' in the upper 40s loaded down and get almost 3.5mpg cruising.
I had a 2001 225 2 stroke Yamaha on a 1984 23' I redid and got upper 40s light, even hit 50 when I first put it back together, and mid 40s loaded. Cruising speed was about 2.2mpg That was with a Stainless Marine bracket. I raised the floor 3" higher than the factory floor and my "plan" was to put a 300 suzuki on it. Boat self bailed awesome with the higher floor. That being said a used 300 suzuki would be great. Me personally I would stay away from the 300hpdi. The 150hpdi and 200hpdi were good motors though. I had a 200hpdi and loved it. Buying a used one make sure all updates have been done. I will probably go with a 200hpdi on my 20'MA I own now. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a pair of 150 etecs on my 23, flat out I run 38knts after I switched to four blade props , this is a bit slower than the 3 blades I used to have on it
top speed with the 3 blades was 46knts but the engines were only turning 5000 rpm. working too hard I like the efficiency of the engines they hardly burn any fuel, total last season was 3-1/2 to 4 gallons per hour, running trolling ect. with no problems I understand that a single 250 would do the same as I do with the twins less weight on the back end, |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
With my twin 200 HP OX66's I went to four blades as well. Like one of the other posters my WOT dropped by close to 10 MPH. However, I get a much better ride (more stern lift)
Ppeter
__________________
http://i113.photobucket.com/albums/n...iseacraft3.jpg |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The 300 Yamaha is problematic, they don't blow up but have issues with oil consumption and plugs, I have a friend that has twins. He has helped the plugs by switching oil. But they had an oil pump recall and it still uses alot.
The F225 is a very weak engine, the 250 apparently has a variable valve timing thats much better, the 225 does not, that year Yamaha does have a serious corrision issue with the exhaust plate - very expensive 3K and no help from them. Should be inspected certainly before purchase, well known now on THT. The 250/300 is a perfect fit, for our boats, max power to weight ration although none are light these days. Just whatever you can find a deal on.
__________________
Any way you measure it - dumbass is expensive |
![]() |
|
|