|
|
|
|
#1
04-10-2010, 11:44 AM
|
|||
|
|||
not a seacraft but it will do
__________________
we need a lifeguard at the gene pool 
|
|
#2
04-11-2010, 09:30 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: not a seacraft but it will do
I am Impressed!
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] "If You Done It...It Ain't Braggin" my rebuild thread: http://www.classicseacraft.com/commu...ad.php?t=18594
|
|
#3
04-14-2010, 06:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: not a seacraft but it will do
Wholly moley....
__________________
20' Mako 175 'rude Sacto, CA looking for a landlocked 23'-25' Seacraft  http://classicmako.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=13979
|
|
#5
04-20-2010, 09:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: not a seacraft but it will do
thats the newer style house , the older style Jim Smith's were lower slung and much narrower porportionately, still one of the best of the best...it's funny cause I think the last true "Jim Smith" built boat was the Smith 57' fairly early on, there were only a handful... i believe the early Montereys they pulled lines from those boats..I dunno I'd have to ask my buddy he spent a lot of time with Mr. Smith.
__________________
Thank goodness that in the scheme of things you are broke, powerlesss and inconsequential, because with the shortsighted alternatives and idealogy you have you'd be much worse than those you complain about.
|
|
#6
04-21-2010, 12:28 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: not a seacraft but it will do
Have not viewed the post, but most Jim Smiths did not have the nice round tumble-home. They were reverse. I remember the Jack of Hearts from Hatteras. That was an original Smith very fast, originally had 8V-92's and was repowered with Manns. This was back in the early 80's.
I'd definitely consider a Spencer or Bayliss if I could put a boat that big in my yard. One of the prettiest was the old Sportsman Brothers Pride now called Barbara B. Et
|
 |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
