![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Has anyone here tried the new E-tec motors, I like the 175 for my 20', any feedback? 7 year warrantee if bought by 03/31/2006. no maintenance for three years, no break in, and its supposed to be very powerful.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you so a serrch on this web site you should find a very long & involved thread on this topic from several months ago.
Currently, I have twin carb-pig 1998 Yamaha 150's on my 23 SF. I will drive them into the ground. Whenever they do go, I will give serious consideration to the E-TEC's (to a single 250). I have only heard very positive things about them.
__________________
http://i113.photobucket.com/albums/n...iseacraft3.jpg |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
with 7 years on it how can you go wrong?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have run them. And they are all that they say plus some. We have about 600 hrs on a pair right now. If you have specific questions ask away.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The e-tech's have no Scheduled maintenance for the first 3 years. No one said anything about UN-Scheduled visits to the dealer.... Why not buy the 175 Suzuki??? The weight is nearly the same so that's not a factor. I have twin 115's and oil changes cost me 4 quarts + a $6 oil filter at Autozone. And, oh yeah, plugs are $1.50 each. Oil for the Etec is about $30.00/gallon [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img] and I don't even want to know how much a set of plugs are. I know Opti plugs are about $15 each!. That's just my 2c. Good luck with whatever you decide.
__________________
Capt. Brian |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the advice guys, still cant decide, which way to go.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The hole shot on the Etec is awesome compared to the Suzuki.
I friend put a 140 on his recently redone 20 and he has a HAARRDD time getting up on plane. I think a 250 Etec on a 23 is a perfect match. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
He must have the wrong size prop....
__________________
1986 Seacraft 23CC etec 250 Portland, Maine |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Best regards, Roger http://members.cox.net/rhstg44/Misc/...go%20small.jpg 1979, 20' Master Angler |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would say wrong prop too. Trayder has a 20 with the 140 and it doesn't struggle to get on plane, even with me and "fat azz" Capt Chuck aboard. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
|
![]() |
|
|