Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > General Discussion > General
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-02-2006, 07:41 PM
CapeBoater1 CapeBoater1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Orleans, MA
Posts: 103
Default 1974 23 SF I/O Desirability

I am new to seacrafts and was wondering what models were most sought after. I understood that people liked the I/O models, but see mostly outboards here. Is it just that I/O's are harder to come by or are outboards more desirable? I may have the opportunity to buy and I/O so I wanted to check with everyone here!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-02-2006, 08:04 PM
ScottM ScottM is offline
Dieter Sprockets
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Marshfield, MA
Posts: 2,221
Default Re: 1974 23 SF I/O Desirability

SwampYankee,
Most guys will prefer an OB, but I also think it comes down to availability. There were more OB-powered 23-foot SCs built than I/Os or IBs. I personally love the lines of an I/O (or IB) due to the enclosed transom. However, the engine box in an I/O can be an issue since it takes up a lot of room. Out on the Cape where you are, there is a large concentration of 23 I/Os that I've seen, especially with doghouse consoles.

If I was in the market and an I/O came up for the right price, I would buy it.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-02-2006, 08:16 PM
oldfielder oldfielder is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Miller Place, NY
Posts: 269
Default Re: 1974 23 SF I/O Desirability

I love mine-it's no speed demon,but it runs beautifully through the snotty LI Sound-and I don't even have tabs on it-yet. With a 5.7 mercruiser it cruises at a nice 32 mph.
And those lines-they sure are pretty.I posted a pic. of her a few weeks ago.
Just remember-with the i/o you will definitely be doing more work on the motor. But the the flipside is that the repower is not as much as the ob. I'm not trying to get one of those Hull Truth 0/b vs. I/o pi##ing matches going-there are just things to consider about your comfort zone. The best part is that I've learned to do most of my own maintenance and the motor is right there in the boat (taking up deck space)lol.
You will love the ride on either boat-end of story.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-03-2006, 07:59 AM
CapeBoater1 CapeBoater1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Orleans, MA
Posts: 103
Default Re: 1974 23 SF I/O Desirability

That's a beautiful boat you have. Personally I think it is one of the nicest looking ones here. Those photos really show off the classic seacraft lines. Thanks for the input on maintenance etc. That has always been my understanding, that I/O's require more maintenance, which is a trade off.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-13-2006, 06:36 PM
Rhodnett Rhodnett is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 15
Default Re: 1974 23 SF I/O Desirability

Oldfielder,

I'm curious about your cruising speed of 32 MPH. I have a '74 23'SF with a '93 Mercruser 5.7 Alpha (4-bbl) and I'm lucky to get 20 kts at 3200 rpm. I seriously doubt if mine will hit 32 wide open. What RPM are you cruising at?

Thanks,

Rusty Hodnett
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-14-2006, 02:05 PM
oldfielder oldfielder is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Miller Place, NY
Posts: 269
Default Re: 1974 23 SF I/O Desirability

Funny you should ask-I installed a cheap navman this year and what a learning experience in efficiency.That 32 was at around 3200-3300, but since I've installed the meter-my best rpm is right around 3000-cruising about 28 in relatively calm seas. That's at a burn of about 10 gph, give or take .1 or .2. The chop on LI sound can change that in a hurry. I ran it at 4000/4001-a little short of wot, which is in the 4400-4800 range according to merc, and I was running just about 30 knots-I think it was 29.7. I/m guessing wot will take me to 37-38 mph.
I'll get you some exact #'s this weekend at 3200 for comparison's sake.
The motor is a carbed merc 5.7 which has been running for about four years of light use, which has change to heavy use since I got the boat
I know everyone here is big tab fans, but so far I'm very happy with t he planing capabilities(if I give it the juice it planes almost immediately) of this boat and since I usually fish with one or two guys on board-it's pretty easy to redistribute the weight.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-14-2006, 08:24 PM
BillPutney BillPutney is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Eastern North Carolina
Posts: 141
Default Re: 1974 23 SF I/O Desirability

I have a '78 i/o that I converted to bracketed o/b and the speed to plane/fuel cons./and overall performance is very satisfactory. 2 stroke Suzuki 225 2000 model,GPS 47.53 MPH max speed attained,

Normal cruie speed ,depending on conditions
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-03-2006, 07:51 AM
CapeBoater1 CapeBoater1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Orleans, MA
Posts: 103
Default Re: 1974 23 SF I/O Desirability

Thanks, I always steared away from used I/O's due to additional maintenance, but liked the way the seacrafts looked especially. I guess it comes down to price and condition overall. And also use, I understand you draw more water with an I/0 vs an outboard setup, which I realized but hadn't really thought about.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-03-2006, 08:21 PM
HugsTug HugsTug is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mattituck, Long Island New York
Posts: 1
Default Re: 1974 23 SF I/O Desirability

New to the site so let me introduce myself. My name is Tom Hug
I am located on the east end of Long Island on the North Fork in Mattituck. I have been lurking around this site for a time and decided to log in.
I own a 1973 Mako with a 5.7 Bravo engine coupled to a Bravo 1 out drive. I could not be happier with the performance of the boat. Great fuel milage and the closed transom is ideal for the waters that I fish. Granted that maintenance is higher, but the end result is that the noise level is much lower, and the replacement value of the engine is much less.
Glad to be a member.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-06-2006, 12:53 PM
catman115 catman115 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: connecticut
Posts: 112
Default Re: 1974 23 SF I/O Desirability

Welcome to the site Hug.. glad to have you aboard and a fellow Long Island sound guy.
back to the original topic..I/o vs O/b
I had a seafari 0/b..great boat
I now have a Tiara with a 5.7 Volvo penta with duoprop. I don't mind the engine box and the decreased engine noise is a big benefit for me. plus the enclosed transom.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft