Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > General Discussion > General
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-28-2011, 11:13 AM
zendora zendora is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 130
Default 23 SeaCraft IB vs OB

I'm ready to buy, and I'm looking for a little advice. I'm set on a 23 Sea Craft hull, and I have two in mind - one is a CC with a low hour 250 four stroke ob, the other a Potter built Savage model with a straight inboard, model year 2000 5.7l 310hp Pleasurecraft Marine, fuel injected and fresh water cooled with only 80 hrs. Both have recent structural improvements (new transom on the OB, etc.). I know the outboard is extremely reliable as I've run boats with the same motor and have seen outstanding performance and reliability with them. I know nothing about the Pleasurecraft engine, so any insight or helpful links would be greatly appreciated.

I understand the ride advantage goes to the inboard, and from what I'm told, fuel economy between this IB and OB would be comparable. Speed adv goes to the outboard, but thats not all that important to me - much happier with an efficient 22-25 kt cruise. Layout I have to give to the Savage, bc the cuddy will make my fiance happy.

Let me know if you all have any thoughts on the CC vs Savage, and more importantly info on the Pleasurcraft power plant.
__________________
1978 23' Savage I/B

ZEN http://s1080.beta.photobucket.com/user/mfeenan/library/
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-28-2011, 11:41 AM
DonV DonV is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Apollo Beach or Islamorada
Posts: 3,488
Send a message via ICQ to DonV
Default Re: 23 SeaCraft IB vs OB

Quote:
Layout I have to give to the Savage, bc the cuddy will make my fiance happy
You added in another item that could change the whole issue. I was all for the OB until you brought in the woman angle. However have you ever tried to dock a single inboard? Great in a straight line, however tricky to manuver. I'm still in favor of the OB. Good luck!!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-28-2011, 12:12 PM
zendora zendora is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 130
Default Re: 23 SeaCraft IB vs OB

Quote:

You added in another item that could change the whole issue. I was all for the OB until you brought in the woman angle. However have you ever tried to dock a single inboard? Great in a straight line, however tricky to manuver. I'm still in favor of the OB. Good luck!!
I'm trying to keep her happy Don! It can be tricky in reverse, but I'm comfortable maneuvering a single screw IB. Is that your main reason for choosing the OB or did you have any other advantages in mind? Thanks for the comment!
__________________
1978 23' Savage I/B

ZEN http://s1080.beta.photobucket.com/user/mfeenan/library/
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-28-2011, 03:50 PM
DonV DonV is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Apollo Beach or Islamorada
Posts: 3,488
Send a message via ICQ to DonV
Default Re: 23 SeaCraft IB vs OB

Not really. It's just the maintenance on outboards seems to be cheaper in the long run and they are getting very dependable. However if you are planning on long trips for like grouper fishing, etc. and it was a diesel versus gas....that's a different story. Chuck also makes a very good point to think about, inboards and the ground do not mix quite as well as an outboard with tilt/trim. Take care.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-28-2011, 04:18 PM
zendora zendora is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 130
Default Re: 23 SeaCraft IB vs OB

Thanks for the comments guys. I'm new to the site and forgot to mention that im in New England, but all valid points anyways. Does anyone have any experience running with the 5.7L Pleasurecraft block?
__________________
1978 23' Savage I/B

ZEN http://s1080.beta.photobucket.com/user/mfeenan/library/
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-28-2011, 04:59 PM
Gary Hill Gary Hill is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Portsmouth, Va.
Posts: 138
Default Re: 23 SeaCraft IB vs OB

I have a 1976 IB CC and went with a carb Marine Power 350 ( I can work on) not bad on gas (around 2+) and cruize at 3150 @ 26-27. I anchor up and yes first single engine inboard I ever had and got used to it fast and also keep it in the water, ever in VA Beach I can give you a ride.
__________________
GARY
76 SEACRAFT CC INBOARD
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-29-2011, 09:39 AM
pelican pelican is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: cape may nj
Posts: 596
Default Re: 23 SeaCraft IB vs OB

Quote:
Thanks for the comments guys. I'm new to the site and forgot to mention that im in New England, but all valid points anyways. Does anyone have any experience running with the 5.7L Pleasurecraft block?
that's a TBI engine,yes ?
the throttle body engines have had a few problems with "going lean",it will cuase the intake valves to be sucked into the cylinder head...
other than that,it's important to have the engine "propped" correctly,and last,the exhaust system,it's gonna require replacement every 4-5yrs...
__________________
do not let common sense get in your way
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-28-2011, 02:31 PM
Capt Chuck's Avatar
Capt Chuck Capt Chuck is offline
gucci
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sailfish Capital, fla
Posts: 2,804
Default Re: 23 SeaCraft IB vs OB

Welcome to CSC !

If you live in Fla and visit shallow water and want to take your Fiance' and pull up to the sandbars for fun & shore lunches or fish the reefs, anchoring can be a hassel. Also, an inboard can have trailering issues with shallow ramps.

I'm sure you will enjoy the ride which ever route you decide
__________________


1978 23' Superfish/Potter Bracket 250HP --------



as "Americans" you have the right to ......
"LIFE, LIBERTY and the PURSUIT of a Classic SeaCraft" -capt_chuck
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-01-2011, 11:07 AM
fredetzel fredetzel is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: maryland chesapeake bay
Posts: 58
Default Re: 23 SeaCraft IB vs OB

You will be happy with the ib or ob both have their ups and downs.I like the ib because the transom is clear [nothing to snag fishing gear on].Maneuvering an ib is easy once you get the hang of it.The girl friend will want the cabin for obvious reasons.Good luck with which ever one you choose [the girl or the boat]. just kidding she will love it.
__________________
1978 sceptre inboard fwc marine power
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-01-2011, 03:43 PM
cdavisdb cdavisdb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sarasota, FL
Posts: 1,056
Default Re: 23 SeaCraft IB vs OB

My highly biased 2 cents worth,

That car engine in the inboard will almost always warn you before it breaks, often long before, if you are listening. Further, many of the things that go wrong with an inboard can be fixed by you. Outboards have a nasty habit of quitting with no warning. They are less maintenance and more reliable than inboards, but the no warning thing gets to me.

If you go with the inboard, get a wider set of gauges than comes with the boat, vacuum gauge, oil temp, fuel pressure, raw water pressure will help in seeing problems coming, some of the cheapest insurance you can buy.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft