|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Seacraft Sceptre 23 Flybridge
Am I crazy? Were there enough of these built for it to be possible to find one? Did they ever go into production? Has anyone ever seen one? How about putting a bridge on the hardtop model. I just love the idea of having a salon on a 23' boat. What could be better? Can't tell you how much I would have paid to sit on a couch in the shade when I was 10 hours into a trip on my CC. Even if it felt like the space was smaller than the truck of my car.
I posted this in the General Discussion section, but if deemed appropriate it can be moved to the for sale section |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
In my opinion, you will be better off with a 25ft Bertram. It will be much easier to find, its 2 feet longer and 2 feet wider. A single 225hp will give you 25mph cruise and 40mph light.
Its not a Seacraft but its a Bertram! Here is mine. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I would have to agree with Captbone on this one. I have a hardtop and a crows nest tower on top. Get two big guys up there and it leans pretty bad. And on a drift, with people up top, it rolls badly.
Nor have I ever seen one of the "flying bridge" 23' models you reference.
__________________
1977 SeaCraft 23' Sceptre W/ Alum Tower & Yamaha 225 www.LouveredProductsUnlimited.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
I think the Bertram is definitely a much better platform for stability, but it needs an over sized load permit to go on a trailer. I think the shape Seacraft hull is the best for stability, the steps function like miniature keels. I think a single straight inboard with a diesel would help stability as well, whether it would be enough... I don't know. Might have to limit the Salon height to 5'6" and make the flybridge a seated bridge. If you could make the salon a step down that would help as well. I love NoBone's build as well. I'd buy one of those if I could as well. I'd have to go straight shaft diesel instead of the outboards though. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
What about getting a straight inboard 23 Sceptre or Tsunami, and taking the windshield off and building a small flybridge on that?
Am I the only one fascinated by the Flying Bridge? """"EDITED""""" Last edited by Capt Chuck; 05-16-2012 at 01:51 PM. Reason: Posting Rules have been violated |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
FpJeepy
This the second time I have had to edit or delete your posts Please read the forum sticky rules before you post again. NO WANT to BUY, eBay or CRAIGSLIST ads are PERMITTED!!!! thank you for your cooperation Capt Chuck (ADMIN) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I remember a 1970's Seabird 23 flybridge model that was very beautiful but too topheavy for an 8 foot beam, it was OK inshore but in offshore swells it rocked like a drunken sailor on shore leave. Too much weight on top unbalanced her and that's probably what would happen with any narrow-beam boat, I think a lightweight tower is the best bet on these models.
__________________
Boatless again! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
hundreds of hours of work and tens of thousands of dollars to get the boat you want, and a simple permit is going to carry weight in the decision of which hull to build ? you will spend more (much more) time changing sand paper disks than it will take to get the permit Requiring a bigger truck or bigger engines is a good reason not to go above 8.5' beam.
__________________
http://www.boatbuildercentral.com/ my rebuild thread: http://www.classicseacraft.com/commu...ad.php?t=22090 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
As much as I love my SC, Captbone is right on. The 23 does not handle a high CG very well (but is very forgiving fore and aft).
If a salon is of interest to you, see the following thread: http://www.classicseacraft.com/commu...ad.php?t=23185
__________________
1974 23' Tsunami, fully refurbished, custom pilothouse, Hermco Bracket, 250 Etec 1977 23' Sceptre fully refurbished, soft top, I/O |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|