|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
20' seacraft performance???
Im rebuilding a 20' seacraft and will be putting a bracket and thinking a zuke 175. Wonder if anyone has an idea of what kind of performance I could expect to see with this setup.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I think old school consensus is that zuke 175 is kind of heavy, nearly 200 lbs heavier than the 300 lbs motors the 20 was designed for. Read Bushwacker's sticky about his experience with a 430 lb etec on a Seafari 20 w/Hermco flotation bracket.
My 20 has a 300 lb 115hp motor and performs quite well. In our SoCal swells, 20 knots makes you airborne most of the year so no real need for a 50mph. Properly rigged you should see close to 50 mph wound up. Having so many power options, I would recommend against that much weight, but someone else will insist you ll be fine. Good luck on your resto and keep us posted on your progress.
__________________
there's no such thing as normal anymore... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Gillie has an I-6 Merc "Tower of Power"; I've heard that the early ones were as light as 260 lbs! My 1975 Evinrude 115 V-4 weighed 300 lbs also. The 1960's vintage motors that Moesly designed the 20' hull for were MUCH lighter than anything available today, so it's VERY important to consider that when you start looking at a new motor!
__________________
'72 SeaFari/150E-Tec/Hermco Bracket, owned since 1975. http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z...Part2019-1.jpg |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
most of the 23's were rigged with twin inline 6 mercs (which have a combined weigh of equal or less than one new v6 four stroke 250)
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Brown & Hauptner Marine! Just a couple miles up the road from me, where I bought my boat from Frank Brown! Unfortunately it was sold about 1985 and turned into the Waterway Cafe! Their website, which says it was built on the site of the Waterway Marina, is wrong! The Waterway Marina, where Fr. Frank worked, is across the street and still in business, but now known as the PGA Marina!
__________________
'72 SeaFari/150E-Tec/Hermco Bracket, owned since 1975. http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z...Part2019-1.jpg |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Zuke 115 = 41 MPH Zuke 140 = 46 MPH Zuke 175 = 51 MPH (might need tabs to stop it from "galloping") |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Yea got a quote from my local etec dealer and was shocked at the price. Im not a speed demon and have also been looking at the merc 150. its roughly 20lb heavier than the etec. the zuke is a bit heavier but they have one heck of a deal on those motors. Bushwhacker has given me great advice and recommends the etec. I am wanting to get a 4stroke so the merc may be the best option with its low weight.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
etec 431lb 4S merc 455lb zuke 485lb |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
83 20sf with new Suzuki 175
I just repowered mine with a zuk 175. I have had to play with understanding how to properly trim the boat, as I am used to being able to trim my other boat up like a bass boat. I only have 6 hours on the engine, so WOT has only been a coupe quick burst as suggested by the mfr. Said all that to say this, is is performing well. 45 mph WOT, but I had 4 in the boat. Real smooth rides. I do have 3 batteries under the console, with 2 heavy trolling motor batts towards the front of the console. I do have trim tabs, but I'm still learning how to use them. It cruises at 35mph at around 4000 rpm. I am very happy.
|
|
|