Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > Recovered Threads
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-02-2017, 12:23 PM
dginge dginge is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 198
Default seacraft sceptre 23 With twin 150 yami 4 strokes

Hey guys.
The search continues. I've located a great boat. 1978 23 sceptre with a pair of
150's 4 strokes. They are on a bracket. How will the boat perform like this? Will
It be way to tailheavy? Looks like they wright 500 pounds a pair. Thanks so much for the info
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-02-2017, 12:36 PM
Vezo, Part II Vezo, Part II is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,026
Default

I can't wait to hear the responses, I don't own a 23 yet. First questions by the professionals will be year, make and model of outboards and brand of bracket. Don't lose this one while waiting for responses. 1979 is last year of the Potter built hulls and Solid!!! Best of Luck. I know waiting for responses can be worse than Christmas Eve, but I'm expecting all positive feedback.

Vezo, Part II
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-02-2017, 12:44 PM
dginge dginge is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 198
Angry

4FDBB407-1561-4F68-97CB-4EF4B3B437FE.jpeg
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-02-2017, 12:49 PM
dginge dginge is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 198
Default

Year is a 1978. 150 2004. Yami four stokes
Attached Images
  
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-02-2017, 01:06 PM
dginge dginge is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 198
Default

More pics
Attached Images
   
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-02-2017, 01:13 PM
Vezo, Part II Vezo, Part II is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,026
Default

Wow! Need to know if transom was redone. Strange looking transom enclosure from an open transom, maybe twins, but the older 20" shafts. That would be my first concern, and if the transom was redone for current owner, next question; was the fuel tank replaced as well?

Vezo
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-02-2017, 01:43 PM
dginge dginge is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 198
Default Shafts

Unless I'm not following you, Are you sure they are 20 inch shafts on there?
They look long to me. Did you mean to say 2" inch transome?



QUOTE=Vezo, Part II;253090]Wow! Need to know if transom was redone. Strange looking transom enclosure from an open transom, maybe twins, but the older 20" shafts. That would be my first concern, and if the transom was redone for current owner, next question; was the fuel tank replaced as well?

Vezo[/QUOTE]
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-02-2017, 03:48 PM
Bushwacker Bushwacker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: N. Palm Beach, Fl.
Posts: 2,456
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vezo, Part II View Post
Wow! Need to know if transom was redone. Strange looking transom enclosure from an open transom, maybe twins, but the older 20" shafts. . .

Vezo
That was Potter's early transom closing system that allowed installation of a bracket without redoing the transom. That's a Hermco bracket so it might have enough flotation to at least offset all that weight.

You're right to be concerned about motor weight, because this boat was designed for the 2-stroke motors made in the early-mid 70's! If this was a CC model, I'd be suspicious that your CG is too far aft, but some of the later SCI Sceptre's seem to be bow heavy, maybe because they used plywood in the decks instead of balsa core, so that configuration might work ok on a SeaCraft Industries model, 1980 or later. 78 is a Potter model, so should have balsa core in the decks. If you do a sea trial on it, I'd trim the motors up as far as possible, retract the trim tabs all the way and see if it has a tendency to porpoise. If it does so easily, that's a sign you need some more weight up front to compensate for that half ton of weight sitting 30" aft of the transom!
__________________
'72 SeaFari/150E-Tec/Hermco Bracket, owned since 1975.
http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z...Part2019-1.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-07-2017, 10:45 PM
dginge dginge is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 198
Default Transom

It was not redone but solid. It's a hermco bracket specific for that transom. It's the potter mold



Quote:
Originally Posted by Vezo, Part II View Post
Wow! Need to know if transom was redone. Strange looking transom enclosure from an open transom, maybe twins, but the older 20" shafts. That would be my first concern, and if the transom was redone for current owner, next question; was the fuel tank replaced as well?

Vezo
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-02-2017, 02:07 PM
DonV DonV is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Apollo Beach or Islamorada
Posts: 3,488
Send a message via ICQ to DonV
Default

Have the engines had the flywheels upgraded?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft