Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > Recovered Threads
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-08-2018, 09:42 PM
John3325 John3325 is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 173
Default 23' Seacraft - 1998 PCM 454 Performance Experience?

Since this is specific to one particular engine, I wanted to start a new thread. I have come across a 1998 new old stock PCM 454 FWC MPI engine for short money (in comparison to a new Merc or Crusaer 350).

Does anyone have performance numbers, pros, cons to a 454 in a 23 SF straight inboard setup?

One con is I will have to reconfigure my console. My front seat will have to be raised, along with the shelf on the inside of the console. This is a considerable amount of work, but the price of the PCM is enticing.

Any thoughts, comments, concerns, input is greatly appreciated!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-10-2018, 11:50 AM
Islandtrader Islandtrader is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Tarpon Capital Of The World
Posts: 2,122
Default

All I know about 454's is that they suck a tremendous amount of gas...and they do weigh more than the small block. That is why Mercury is selling the stroker engine as a replacement for a big block. Better economy and more torque.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

"If You Done It...It Ain't Braggin"



my rebuild thread: http://www.classicseacraft.com/commu...ad.php?t=18594
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-10-2018, 12:56 PM
John3325 John3325 is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 173
Default

I agree, I ended up passing on this opportunity due to console restrictions.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-14-2018, 10:28 PM
vintage23 vintage23 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Beach Haven, NJ
Posts: 18
Default

I have a 454 in a 23 center console. Currently restoring boat, floor transom, etc. planning on putting back the 454. It's not as bad on fuel as people think. I ran a 17x17 prop on it and it manuvered very well at slow speed, plus had an insane hole shot. Cruised at 22kts, wot 35kts. Not sure of the burn rate at those speeds.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-14-2018, 10:38 PM
DonV DonV is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Apollo Beach or Islamorada
Posts: 3,488
Send a message via ICQ to DonV
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vintage23 View Post
I have a 454 in a 23 center console. Currently restoring boat, floor transom, etc. planning on putting back the 454. It's not as bad on fuel as people think. I ran a 17x17 prop on it and it manuvered very well at slow speed, plus had an insane hole shot. Cruised at 22kts, wot 35kts. Not sure of the burn rate at those speeds.
I don't think you really want to know!!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-28-2018, 10:17 PM
gofastsandman gofastsandman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: W.P.B. ,Fl.
Posts: 4,586
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DonV View Post
I don't think you really want to know!!
12 minlons.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-13-2019, 10:38 PM
fishup fishup is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: quincy
Posts: 9
Default

I did the job on the console that you described. It was not that bad. Cut the hatch rim off and leave enough material to glass to "3 inches" fasten aluminum angle to the rim and bottom. make up some closed cell foam strips but enough to spam the gap and lay it up on the inside. Remove aluminum and lay up the outside. Changed console to a command console at the same time.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-20-2018, 11:36 AM
db3155 db3155 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Merritt isl Fl.
Posts: 51
Default

Not a seacraft but my 24' Performer CC, I run 30 miles offshore not turning the motor off all day, trolling and home on 50 gallons of gas. the trick is knowing where your secondary's open up and not going there.
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-26-2018, 09:39 PM
HunterThompson HunterThompson is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 8
Default

I have a 26' formula 242ls that weighs in close to 5000lbs. With my previous 2 engines (476ci making 425hp and 509ci making 618hp) the fuel consumption was amazingly lower than many people thought. As stated above, mark your throttle where your primaries are open as far as they can before cracking the secondaries. That boat runs a bravo out drive instead of straight like the sc will. The key to fuel efficiency is propping it to perform well at cruise with the secondaries closed. That boat averaged 3.5-4mpg at cruise depending on the amount of people on board.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft