I Don't Think So? - Page 2

NoBones · #11 05-25-2006, 12:17 AM

I did the same, his reponse was he would check in the morning.
This will be interesting

See ya, Ken

lost2a6 · #12 05-25-2006, 02:53 AM

That boat looks similar to a boat that a co-worker had. He also thought it was a SeaCraft because the hull # started with SC, come to find out the SC stood for Space Craft.

RS · #13 05-25-2006, 08:30 AM

Quote:

I was wondering about that one too. Looks real nice, but something about it just doesn't look right, don't know what it is.

It's not a variable deadrise hull. You can see it in the shot of the transom. It shows strakes instead of vertical risers.

wavelength · #14 05-25-2006, 08:27 PM

I ran it and in NJ it is registered as a 23ft. 1974 "TRA". I dont know what a "TRA" is but it does look like a John Allmond to me too.

NoBones · #15 05-25-2006, 10:22 PM

Negative on the Allmand, John Allmand's son is with my
company. He looked at it today and said NO!
See ya, Ken

JW-Tex · #16 05-25-2006, 11:52 PM

I sent the high bidder a link to this thread 24 hours ago...JW

Blue_Heron · #17 05-26-2006, 06:56 AM

Quote:

I sent the high bidder a link to this thread 24 hours ago...JW

I sent the seller a message two days ago telling him he was mistaken and it's not a Seacraft. I included a link to Clasicseacraft.com. He replied that he was selling for a friend and didn't really know very much about the boat. I mentioned that he could verify it's not a seacraft by the HIN. His reply was:

"serial# s?c10431m74b is that help at all? the secound letter seems to be an I or an E not sure."

I also suggested he revise his description as it would be a shame to screw up his 100% positive feedback because his buddy gave him a bad description. As of this writing, no revision to the description.