![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does anyone have any experience with an eTec 115 on a 20CC 20" with no bracket?
__________________
Otto And yes, I still believe in the four boat theory... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Otto.. buy one and send it down, I'll put it on my boat and let you know all about it...
![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
Don Battin Pipe Dreams Marine "Design her right, Build’er well Bend the throttles, And let’er eat…." Carl Moesly |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don.... What, and give up that 88 Johnson of yours? Say it ain't so!!!!
__________________
http://i113.photobucket.com/albums/n...iseacraft3.jpg |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Otto,
Just put a new 115 Etec on our bowrider...you know what they are like ![]() With 3 adults + 1/2 tank gas, ran 37mph ... Fast enough to get me out of the rain.... But it's nice to be able to cruise along AND have a conversation! It's a quiet running machine!
__________________
SeaCraft:1966 19' Bowrider & 1962 21' Raceboat |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A 115 will be a little under powered but will push it, I had an inline 6 115 on my 18 and it did OK, the sf20 isn't much different. I do like my 200 Merc on my 20 MA though, real smooth with all the HP.
__________________
Any way you measure it - dumbass is expensive |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a 79 MA with an e-tec 175, wot is 50/51 mph and I personaly like the horse power. That being said I think that the E-Tec 115 would perform on the 20 footers. It gets down to what do you expect performance wise?
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Otto
I also think the 115hp might be underpower for a 20' SeaCraft. I have the 1st generation eTech 115hp (1998) on my 18' flats skiff which of coarse is much lighter than the 20. I can get mid/high 40's @ WOT 5500 rpm slinging a 13 3/4 x 17 SS prop. ![]()
__________________
![]() ![]() 1978 23' Superfish/Potter Bracket 250HP -------- as "Americans" you have the right to ...... "LIFE, LIBERTY and the PURSUIT of a Classic SeaCraft" -capt_chuck |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The 115 eTec will push it okay. No speed demon, though. But I really recommend more horsepower. Here's why:
I had a 1973 120 hp Chrysler on the back of my current 1972 20' Seafari when I bought it. It planed easily, and cruised at 23-24 mph, and topped out at 27-28 mph. It was also very dependable. But in December 2001, I was caught by a VERY violent winter squall in the Gulf of Mexico that, because I couldn't make better than 28 mph, I just couldn't outrun it coming in from 20 miles offshore. I later figured that if I could have maintained just 34-35 mph when I first headed in, I could have outrun that squall, instead of having to turn to just 3 miles offshore to avoid foundering, and spending the next 3+ hours pointing up into 30-45 kt winds and 6'-9'seas, all with my wife and two small children aboard. So the next week, I made arrangements to buy a remanufactured Merc 150, which eventually gave me a cruise of 35-38 mph, and a top speed of 46-47 fully loaded. (And I got better economy, too!) I also had a 20' MA with a 115 Mercury "Tower of Power" back in the early 80's, which cruised in the mid 20's and I would guess topped out between 30-32 mph. Needed the trim tabs to plane quickly, though. I later put a '78 175 hp Merc on it. It's like this: Marine HORSEPOWER is like a firearm. It's better to have it and never need it, than need it and not have it. My 2 cents worth.
__________________
Common Sense is learning from your mistakes. Wisdom is learning from the other guy's mistakes. Fr. Frank says: Jesus liked fishing, too. He even walked on water to get to the boat! Currently without a SeaCraft ![]() (2) Pompano 12' fishing kayaks '73 Cobia 18' prototype "Casting Skiff", 70hp Mercury |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Father Frank-Happy b-day!
__________________
Snookerd |
![]() |
|
|