Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > Recovered Threads
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-25-2016, 05:55 PM
Old'sCool Old'sCool is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 2,122
Default Hermco/Suzuki question

Merry Christmas!! I'm re-powering my 23' with Suzuki 300 and am asking a question/opinion directed at Don and others here......Suzuki is recommending two bolts on top engine mount, six total. Don, is your XL bracket good to go for another hole in that area? Any issues drilling another hole below the top set? Are others here with Suzuki 300 mounting them with six fasteners either transom or bracket?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-25-2016, 08:14 PM
kmoose kmoose is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ocala, Florida
Posts: 1,817
Default

4 quality bolts on mine with no issues. I have a Hermco twin in the shed waiting for the winter.
__________________
[b]The Moose is Loose !
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-27-2016, 12:11 AM
Snookerd Snookerd is offline
Founding Father
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Bradenton, FL.
Posts: 2,658
Default

4 bolts on mine.
__________________
Snookerd
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-27-2016, 07:05 PM
hermco hermco is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Jensen Beach, FL
Posts: 827
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old'sCool View Post
Merry Christmas!! I'm re-powering my 23' with Suzuki 300 and am asking a question/opinion directed at Don and others here......Suzuki is recommending two bolts on top engine mount, six total. Don, is your XL bracket good to go for another hole in that area? Any issues drilling another hole below the top set? Are others here with Suzuki 300 mounting them with six fasteners either transom or bracket?
I would not have any qualms with adding the extra bolts although I am not sure it is necessary, Denny/Bushwacker may have some input on the engineering aspects, I would say just be sure you have the engine height dialed in before doing so or u may be drilling more holes than u need.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-27-2016, 08:39 PM
DonV DonV is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Apollo Beach or Islamorada
Posts: 3,488
Send a message via ICQ to DonV
Default

Let's see, 1/2" fine thread 316 SS bolt X 4 of them. Hummm.....I would Google the tensile stregth, shear numbers, etc., you will be shocked. It's not 7Marine 627, jeeeez
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-27-2016, 11:34 PM
Bushwacker Bushwacker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: N. Palm Beach, Fl.
Posts: 2,456
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hermco View Post
I would not have any qualms with adding the extra bolts although I am not sure it is necessary, Denny/Bushwacker may have some input on the engineering aspects, I would say just be sure you have the engine height dialed in before doing so or u may be drilling more holes than u need.
Don's right, focus on getting the engine height correct first! Although the 23 is a different animal, my experience on a 20 is that AV plate will need to be almost 6" above keel to get AV plate above clean water, so you may need a jack plate to get it high enough.

Regarding bolt strength, 6 bolts is rather serious overkill! Although I would defer to the opinion of Capt. Terry, who was much more of a "hard metal" mechanical engineer than me (I specialized in the "hot air" heat transfer/thermodynamics end of the business!), my take on it is that 4 bolts are more than adequate. Per the Marx Mechanical Engineering Handbook, 4 Grade 5 1/2-13 UNC bolts are very conservatively good for a working stress of at least 85,000 PSI at a proof load and 120,000 PSI ultimate stress. This translates to a proof load of about 4800 lbs for 4 bolts; any higher than that and they'd start to stretch, but they'd go up to about 6800 lbs before they'd break. That means you could lift your entire boat with just those 4 bolts! If you wanted even more strength, Grade 8 bolts are good for 150,00 psi ultimate and high carbon Cro-moly steels are much stronger than that, but you may have trouble finding stainless Grade 8 bolts.

The main thing is to just make sure the bolts are torqued evenly and correctly with an accurate torque wrench. (I don't trust the fancy click-stop type because you have no way of knowing if they're out of calibration! With the simple direct reading beam-type, if it doesn't read 0 with no-load, it's real obvious if it's been over-torqued! Mine reads about 12 ft-lbs with no load on it, but it's real easy to compensate for that!)
__________________
'72 SeaFari/150E-Tec/Hermco Bracket, owned since 1975.
http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z...Part2019-1.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-28-2016, 07:58 AM
Old'sCool Old'sCool is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 2,122
Default

Thanks to all. The engine height would need to be correct first for sure.

So Don, If I decide to add two additional is that area of the bracket the same configuration as where the other holes are? Your bracket came pre-drilled so I never saw chips.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-28-2016, 08:43 AM
kmoose kmoose is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ocala, Florida
Posts: 1,817
Default

On mine I plan to test fit the bracket and motor on the current transom prior to the rebuild to help determine the optimal mounting for each. This will allow me to run the boat with the bracket mounted to Don's specs and see if I can get the motor at the right height and test it under load with my standard crew and gear. My goal is to not need a jack plate for the 30" Zuke considering I got the double bracket.

Considering the Zukes like to run a little deeper due to the large prop size I am optimistic the specified bracket mounting location will put me in the zone where I don't need to mount the bracket higher than specified. Is there any serious consequences if it has to be mounted an inch or so higher?
__________________
[b]The Moose is Loose !
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-28-2016, 12:21 PM
77SceptreOB 77SceptreOB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Columbia, SC.
Posts: 1,611
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kmoose View Post
On mine I plan to test fit the bracket and motor on the current transom prior to the rebuild to help determine the optimal mounting for each. This will allow me to run the boat with the bracket mounted to Don's specs and see if I can get the motor at the right height and test it under load with my standard crew and gear.
Very smart approach.
__________________
1977 SeaCraft 23' Sceptre W/ Alum Tower & Yamaha 225
www.LouveredProductsUnlimited.com
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-28-2016, 02:56 PM
Bushwacker Bushwacker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: N. Palm Beach, Fl.
Posts: 2,456
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kmoose View Post
. . . Is there any serious consequences if it has to be mounted an inch or so higher?
You'll lose some buoyancy, and since the whole point of running the twin bracket is increased buoyancy, I'd think you'd want to avoid raising it. Generally you want to mount the flotation tub as low as possible to maximize flotation/self bailing, and I think Don has that dialed in very well, so I'd try to mount it per Don's recommendations. Motor height is a separate issue and best handled with a minimum setback manual jack plate, or some fixed brackets once you have the height dialed in.
__________________
'72 SeaFari/150E-Tec/Hermco Bracket, owned since 1975.
http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z...Part2019-1.jpg
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft