![]() |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My 2 cents: The Mako's that provide a comparable ride are the 20', deep V'd models ( approx 1977-1980 ). They have the same deadrise as the Mako 25'. And, they were built very well during these years.
The SeaCraft has a pedigree that exists due to years and years of people being amazed at the ride and quality she gives. The Potter built hulls were known to be designed and built exceptionally well ( except for the damn scupper thing ). Unfortunately, the transoms did not fair so well - I feel it is partially because of a few poorly placed stock fittings - but mostly because of negligence over time by owners for not properly sealing fittings and holes right. And that's the key right there - TIME. They last. Other boats 'out there', that are good oldies are boats like Formula's and Bertram's. And, they are part of that pedigree idea. They are also part of a scarce, few boats that you will see re-done ( in this size ) because they are worthy of it... They have withstood the test of time as being extremely seaworthy, well-designed and well-built boats - These are the qualities that people buying boats want - especially avid boaters. When I was choosing to upgrade my boat from a 20' Grady Overnighter ( in mint condition ), I made my choice by talking to fiberglass guys, boot yard mechanics, peopel who owned different 'salty boats'. And, for one reason or another - SeaCraft was one of the names that popped up on everyones list. So, I 'found' a hull for $3500 and am in the process of a complete re-do. Partially because I cannot afford to have someone do it for me, because I don't feel anyone will do it w/ as much eye to detail, and in the end, I know I will have a boat that will be worth every penny - for many more years to come... Can I get an amen ? |
|
|