![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
1st Let me express my admiration for the 23' Seacraft and say some of my best days have been spent frshing from these boats.
I have a very pointed question towards the bias for Potter built hulls. It appears that often stringers, transoms and cored parts need to be replaced in both Potter and later built hulls. If I were going to restore or purchase a restored Seacraft that involved such major structurial repairs, is a Potter hull any better than say a Tracker built boat. It would seem with a restoration that involved such a major repair the original design would remain, but the quality differences between the years would be erased. [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] Thanks J |
|
|