Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > General Discussion > General
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #4  
Old 06-02-2005, 07:11 PM
Capt Chuck's Avatar
Capt Chuck Capt Chuck is offline
gucci
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sailfish Capital, fla
Posts: 2,804
Default Re: Potter hulls?

Quote:
and what it boils down to IMHO is hardware and finish issues are really what set the Potter boats ahead. They have a level of care not seen in the Tracker boats, but structurally, I'd put mine up against any.
I'm not trying to start another "Old vs New" bashing thread, although, I would have to agree that the fit and finish on the Potter hulls is plain to see. It's what you CAN'T see that scares the sheet out of me [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img]

Doghouse, you might have a structually sound hull that was produced by Tracker but the problem here is consistency. Unlike the Potter builts, you never know what your going to see when you open up a Tracker hull----> "Was it built right or not"
Riding around on several SeaCrafts will not provide you with a blueprint of it's craftmanship
__________________


1978 23' Superfish/Potter Bracket 250HP --------



as "Americans" you have the right to ......
"LIFE, LIBERTY and the PURSUIT of a Classic SeaCraft" -capt_chuck
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft