Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > General Discussion > Performance
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #18  
Old 02-26-2010, 02:49 AM
Bushwacker Bushwacker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: N. Palm Beach, Fl.
Posts: 2,456
Default Re: Low end torque - 4 stroke vs. 2 stroke

Quote:
. . . Bushwacker showed me some interesting print outs from his E-tech; no torque readings though.
The 2006 BRP brochure has plots of WOT torque and HP vs RPM for the 225 E-Tec and the 225 4S Yamaha. The Yammi just barely makes 225 hp at max rpm, while the E-Tec makes about 240 HP in the 4500-5500 rpm range, so yes the Yammi is weak compared to the "225" E-Tec. The E-Tec puts out almost 2X more torque down around 2000 rpm.

The 2007 brochure compared the 150 E-Tec and 150 Yamaha 4S with similar results. The E-Tec put out about 165 HP from about 4500-5500, while the Yamaha made about 155 HP over a much smaller rpm range. The 150 E-Tec also had a huge torque advantage down in the 2000-3000 rpm range, so it's no surprise that it easily won the "tug-of-war" against the Yamaha. I've pulled points off those curves and plugged them into a spreadsheet that I can send to anyone that want's it if you'll PM me your e-mail address.

When you're looking at acceleration, it's the AREA under the torque vs. rpm curve that counts! When comparing an engine with lots of low speed torque and a flat torque curve to a "peaky" engine with higher peak torque but less area under the torque curve, the flat torque curve engine will win every time, all other factors being equal. With the Zukes, they've changed the "other factors" and gone to more gear reduction to increase torque at the prop, allowing them to use a much larger slower turning more efficient prop, which helps to compensate for less torque at the powerhead. Putting a lower pitch prop with more blade area on ANY engine will tend to improve low speed acceleration, although at the expense of maximum boat speed.

The low speed planing ability and torque vs throttle sensitivity Connor mentioned is a little bit different. I think what he's experienced is the difference between a small displacement/high output/high rpm engine vs a MUCH LARGER displacement/low specific output/lower rpm engine. The larger engine will tend to have more torque at ANY throttle setting just because of it's displacement, and will therefore be more stable under conditions of varying load, such as going up and down hill in a big following sea. Denny
__________________
'72 SeaFari/150E-Tec/Hermco Bracket, owned since 1975.
http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z...Part2019-1.jpg
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft