Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > General Discussion > Performance
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 07-22-2012, 09:05 AM
bgreene bgreene is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 404
Default

At lower rps, I believe the 200/225 fuel consumption not much more that the 150hp looper - same year.

At full throttle I believe these burn about 20% more fuel than the 150.

It's true - those motors burn a lot more fuel than the new motors - such as Merc Opti, and Etec.

If you can find one..........the Evinrude 200/225 after Bombardier took over around 2002 were excellent motors, and burned a lot less fuel too......called the DFI's.....

I had an 05' 200 hp ....told it produced more like 215 hp at the prop and it burned about the same or less fuel than my old 150 hp looper.

Still - unless you're going to put heavy mileage on em such as tuna fishing, it's cheaper to run the 225 carb'd than pay $ 16,000 for a new motor.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft