Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > Recovered Threads
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 11-27-2013, 03:52 PM
joshmon71 joshmon71 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cape Cod, MA
Posts: 194
Default

Armstrongs are cheaper, and do the job, but there is much more float in a Hermco. And you don't have the alum paint regimen do deal with. I have a Armstrong, but have hermco envy. Ideally you have a 30" shaft and a larger bracket for a single 30"( or twin 25"). Mine happens to be a 25" Verado, Armstrong, and dare say one of the heavier OB's out there. One big guy has wet feet in corner. self bails at rest. batts power steering pump and reservoir and 130 gallon tank all forward and or under console.

Gen 2? Is there more bracket being added to the Hermco like out to the middl strake I guess? sweet!

I did check out Hermcos site the other day, there was a shot of a hull extension. That looks very cool . Not on a 23 SC I think. Think Bly did that on his 20?

Some day....Hermco . Love to see someone Gucci up a SC 23 hull extension almost like a Euro transom on a Contender.
__________________
---------
1977 Seacraft, Armstrong Bracket
275(chipped 250!) Verado
Merc Rev 4 17P
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft