Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > Recovered Threads
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10  
Old 03-01-2014, 06:21 PM
Bushwacker Bushwacker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: N. Palm Beach, Fl.
Posts: 2,456
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue_Heron View Post
For floatation, use the 2lb foam. You'll get the same buoyancy for half the cost and half the weight. The heavier foams are structural, for use in casting or sculpting applications where durability is more important than weight or buoyancy.
Dave
I agree with Dave - SeaCraft never depended on foam for strength, it was for flotation only. The original Moesly 21 and maybe the 19 Bowrider, which is the same basic hull as the 20, were built in the 60's prior to the USCG flotation requirement and had NO foam, so they're obviously strong enough without it. Why use the denser foam which will actually provide LESS net buoyancy when the whole purpose of using foam in the first place was to increase buoyancy! The main thing I'd check is to make sure it's closed cell foam, to minimize water retention if it ever does get wet.
__________________
'72 SeaFari/150E-Tec/Hermco Bracket, owned since 1975.
http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z...Part2019-1.jpg
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft