Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > Recovered Threads
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 05-09-2019, 10:20 PM
FLexpat FLexpat is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 669
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FLexpat View Post
I think Bilgerat had 6-700# in the bow to make up for the CG issue with the bracket and twins. I made a rough 3D CAD model of the 25 and calculated the CG shift between a single I/O and twins on a SS bracket - I don't remember exact numbers but remember it was surprisingly large and that Bilgerat's bow ballast didn't even make up for it. I will try and track that stuff down.
Found some files:
Bilgerat used 400 lbs in the anchor locker to get the CG almost to where it should be. Twins on the bracket shifted the CG aft about 40" - likely much more since I estimated bracket weight as 200 lbs (I used FG); far less than it really is. With the 400 lbs in the anchor locker and the 'light' bracket it was still a couple of inches aft of where it should be. If the ballast is in the cabin bilge, lots more is needed.
Like Connor said, the OBs raised the CG a good bit relative to a single I/O (350cid) and ballast in the anchor locker didn't really help that.

My personal opinion for the 25 is that a conversion to a CC with an alum block L83 or L96 under the console jackshafted to an I/O would be perfect but it would be kinda needy on the maintenance side.

Hope this helps.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft