|
|
|
|
#2
11-02-2005, 09:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Price check 23'
$ that got better $
[img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]
__________________
http://www.frenzie.com/frenzielogoline.GIF www.frenzie.com http://www.frenzie.com/custom.htm "Classic SeaCraft" Lures 1983_seacraft_master_angler.]htm My wife and I had words, But I didn't get to use mine."?" 
|
|
#3
11-02-2005, 11:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Price check 23'
just for reference, I know someone who spent close to $40K redoing a 20' that was older than the boat you are looking at [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img]
|
|
#5
11-03-2005, 01:04 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Price check 23'
sounds reasonable. Get us some pics so we can do an internet apprasial for you [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
strick
__________________
"I always wanted to piss in the Rhine" (General George Patton upon entering Germany)
|
|
#6
11-03-2005, 11:43 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Price check 23'
JWB,
If the boat is truly as good as it sounds in your post, then it's a great deal for the money. I would say the only concerns at this point are age/condition of the fuel tank and condition of the deck (soft spots, etc.). Those 140's are very reliable engines, so you shouldn't have any trouble with them, especially if the drives are new too. Regardless of the outboard vs I/O debate, the only down side that I see is the amount of deck space the engine box will eat up. A single I/O is one thing, but with twins there's virtually no walking room behind the console.
|
 |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
