Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > General Discussion > Repairs/Mods.

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9  
Old 11-07-2010, 02:36 PM
Bushwacker Bushwacker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: N. Palm Beach, Fl.
Posts: 2,456
Default Re: Bracket vs hull extension vs stretch????

Todd, I've been a fanatic about low speed planing since day 1, and my rig will plane at 12-13 mph with full load (~3900 lbs total boat + crew load; will email you my weight summary) @ 2500 rpm, exactly what I want. Just ask Snookerd, GFS, Skip or Carla, who have all ridden on my boat in choppy conditions. What it takes is trim tabs, a 4-blade prop, and maybe a Doelfin or equivalent. (I added the fin before I tried a 4-blade prop. May have to take it off one day just to see if it makes any difference.)

Here's a couple photos that should answer the clearance issue. This first one shows fore & aft clearance with motor at full tilt.

This next one is a better shot of clearance with transom . . . about 7.5".
My bracket has a 30" setback. From this picture, I'd say a 24" setback would work fine for a 150 E-tec. Don said he could make them in 18, 24 and 30" sizes. If you went with a 115/130 V-4 E-Tec, you might even be able to use an 18" setback; you should be able find motor height difference between the V-6 and V-4 from BRP website or from this great E-Tec owners forum web page . Just looked at my 2009 catalog and it looks like they've gained weight since I bought mine, or else they've changed from quoting dry weight to wet weight. A 25" shaft 150 is now 433 lbs (mine was 427); a 25 115 is 390 lbs. I do know that BRP includes weight of the cowling. When you compare to a 4-stroke, make sure they include the weight of the oil and cowling!

Although I originally considered the 115,I've ended up so heavily loaded on some of my trips, I'm glad I went with the 150. Even with that load it gets on plane at less than half throttle! One other thing to consider is that the Seafari is a little less stern heavy than the CC's, so that makes motor weight a little less critical. Denny
__________________
'72 SeaFari/150E-Tec/Hermco Bracket, owned since 1975.
http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z...Part2019-1.jpg
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft