Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > Recovered Threads

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #15  
Old 12-27-2013, 10:43 AM
kmoose kmoose is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ocala, Florida
Posts: 1,817
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fr. Frank View Post
The only ride comparable to a SeaCraft I have ever found/experienced is a newer (2003+) Sailfish 21, 23, or 26, all of which use the Moesly VDH hull design.

Contender? great boat, still lands hard in short wave period swells.
Regulator? smooth ride up to 3', then starts to bow jack in any steep swell.
Intrepid? See Contender above.
Scout? Stable, but pounds in any kind of a cross sea.
80's era Mako 238 or 258? Lands hard in a choppy swell mix, always.

And as for the New Mako 234? Got a ride in November in the Keys. It was great in a moderate chop, and choppy swells averaging 2-3, but when the swell got above 3' offshore, the flats on the hard chines slammed the hull pretty hard at any approach angle, and the whole boat shuddered. Near Sombrero Light, we actually had to come off plane in 3-5' seas with a 4 sec. wave period, even with trim tabs.
What are your thoughts on Reggie Fountain hulls? I spent allot of time offshore in a 31 and to this day feel it was one of the most amazing head and quartering sea hulls I had ever been on.
__________________
[b]The Moose is Loose !
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft