Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > Recovered Threads

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #21  
Old 04-04-2016, 05:37 PM
Bushwacker Bushwacker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: N. Palm Beach, Fl.
Posts: 2,456
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1977chris View Post
Does a Hermco Bracket work a lot better on these boats instead of the Armstrong bracket. What's the difference. Is the Hermco Bracket a lot lighter?
The Hermco bracket was designed by Bill Potter specifically for a SeaCraft, so transom angle is a perfect match. Since it's all fiberglass, it's probably a bit heavier than the aluminum Armstrong, but it's flotation tank is much larger, so that would offset any extra weight, at least when at the dock.

I'd run it with the existing motor before considering a 2-stroke. Main advantage of a 2-stroke will be a stronger mid-range/hole shot that will help it get on plane quicker. The 25" 115 E-TEC weight went to 405 lbs when they put the V-6 lower unit on it, so it may not be be that much lighter than the 100 hp Yamaha. If you really want to reduce motor weight, the I-3 90 hp E-TEC at 320-335 lbs would run at least as strong as the 100 4-stroke. Terry England gets very good performance out of a 90 on his modified 19' Bowrider.
__________________
'72 SeaFari/150E-Tec/Hermco Bracket, owned since 1975.
http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z...Part2019-1.jpg
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft