Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > Recovered Threads

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-30-2014, 11:47 PM
FLexpat FLexpat is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 669
Default

Hmmm. 405HP and 450 Ft-lbs out of 383 cid sounds more like a diesel than a gas motor. I've never seen anything like that ratio of ft-lbs/$ in a legitimate marine set-up before. Adding the exhaust manifolds, tstat housing and raw water pump is a grand or so (?). I'm bookmarking that one for the future... A couple of gallons of octane booster could fix the problem with 91.

That kind of torque is well past what is recommended for an Alpha and I think it's a bit past a basic Bravo spec. It may be close to the spec limit for a Bravo 1X... That said, Seacrafts are light enough that drives seem to last a long time if you're nice to them.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-19-2014, 10:27 PM
73tsunami 73tsunami is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 9
Default

Decided to put a 383 stroker in my 73 Tsunami when I restored her last year when she turned 40. It is paired with a bravo one and will hit 52-53mph top end and cruises at 28knots. Had a 350mag prior and although it was more economical it is a totally different boat since dropping in the 383.



Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-21-2014, 10:08 AM
Entourage Entourage is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fairhaven Mass
Posts: 583
Default

How is the fuel economy cruising at 28kts?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-21-2014, 10:45 AM
Islandtrader Islandtrader is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Tarpon Capital Of The World
Posts: 2,122
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Entourage View Post
How is the fuel economy cruising at 28kts?
On the 21 at 28 knots my burn rate is around 9.2 gals /hour...or 3.2 miles/gal.

WOT...25 gal/hr.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

"If You Done It...It Ain't Braggin"



my rebuild thread: http://www.classicseacraft.com/commu...ad.php?t=18594
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-21-2014, 01:37 PM
73tsunami 73tsunami is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 9
Default

Unfortunately I do not have a floscan on boat, but figure burn rate is about 2 miles per gallon based on total burn. The 350 mag was definitely a little better on fuel for me compared to the 383 but not noticeably worse. Was originally thinking of going with an outboard and bracket, but am very comfortable with the performance of the boat paired with a mercruiser with bravo one drive.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-18-2017, 04:45 PM
bgreene bgreene is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 404
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 73tsunami View Post
Unfortunately I do not have a floscan on boat, but figure burn rate is about 2 miles per gallon based on total burn. The 350 mag was definitely a little better on fuel for me compared to the 383 but not noticeably worse. Was originally thinking of going with an outboard and bracket, but am very comfortable with the performance of the boat paired with a mercruiser with bravo one drive.
Is the outdrive capable of handling the torque over the LONG term ?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-18-2017, 08:23 PM
FLexpat FLexpat is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 669
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bgreene View Post
Is the outdrive capable of handling the torque over the LONG term ?
Bravo 1 is good for about 500-550HP for a couple of thousand hours if properly operated and maintained (for the newer 'sweptback' design). Older ones slightly less. The real limit is in torque though. Not too many small blocks can break them. Do a bunch of exits/re-entrys with the throttle improperly managed and you can break anything though.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-18-2017, 09:39 PM
jnamowitz jnamowitz is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 139
Default

This whole thread is right up my alley. I just put a brand new Alpha One Gen II outdrive on my 23 and am now in need of a repower. My 350 is tired. repowering with this 383 engine and a new complete sterndrive unit from SEI is WAY cheaper than any other option I can find. Im going to go this route along with a larger fuel tank. Thanks for all of the info.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-27-2017, 10:43 PM
73tsunami 73tsunami is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 9
Default

I don't abuse my 383 and maintain the drive based on all recommendations made without cutting corners or delaying doing something that is obviously recommended as preventive maintenance. That being said I feel the 383 is the perfect motor for the boat and run her around 3000 to 3500. Cruising speed is right around 27knts. Do not push it up too much only to blow her out once in a while. A am not sure what the expectancy of the drive will be. My mechanic inspects is regularly and feels maintenance and RPMS are the main things to be aware of. Never push her too hard too long and don't step on her out of the hole a lot
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-29-2017, 09:04 PM
bgreene bgreene is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 404
Default

What's the outdrive match for 383 if you don't want to worry about outdrive failure and want to run it at whatever speed desired.

Whatever speed meaning......if it's flat no worries to run/ cruise 35- 40 mph many miles.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft