![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
1. In the outer panel, if you sight aft along the chine from the front of the hull, it looks like there is a slight wedge built into about the aft 10' or so of the panel. 2. On the innermost panel, there appears to be a slight rocker in the last few feet forward of the transom. I haven't been able to speak with Mr. Moesly to confirm the presence of these features, but they represent the type of sophistication which I believe are typical of his designs: The wedge in the outer panel would help the boat develop more stern lift to plane at low speeds, but since all planing hulls develop more lift as speed increases, I suspect that most of that outer panel is out of the waterby about 35 mph. The rocker in the innermost panel would then tend to raise the bow to get even more hull surface out of the water and reduce drag. This is a brilliant concept when you think about it . . . the wedge improves the ride at low speed when you want to slow down in rough conditions, but yet it's out of the way and doesn't hinder top speed when you want to run fast in flat water! I believe the running angle data from the '69 Boating magazine article attached below supports this theory. Note that running angle tends to flatten out up to about 25 mph, but then starts to increase at a little over 35 mph! This test was done on an I/O powered boat with a CG located further forward than it is on an OB model, so this characteristic might be more pronounced on an OB powered boat. IF your boat is a Tracker model, I suspect that none of this applies, because as Blue Heron noted in a previous post, there appears to be a slight hook built into his 20' Tracker model. Since they were produced later with more length and the 25" transom, they were obviously modified for heavier motors, and that probably makes them a better candidate for a bracket than the earlier models.
__________________
'72 SeaFari/150E-Tec/Hermco Bracket, owned since 1975. http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z...Part2019-1.jpg |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Would a smaller console pushed foward be easier? Just a thought.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree a smaller console indeed
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Heck no console and just a tiller, you would have all kinds of room
![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
This may have been a fairly common approach for hulls like bass boats and flats skiffs that were intended to go fast, but need good manners at lower speeds. Both my Action craft and my Hewes Lappy have some hook in the outer hull panels. Dave
__________________
Blue Heron Boat Works Reinventing the wheel, one spoke at a time. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ditto My F233 Thunderbird, real wedge in the outer panel.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes Sir Dave, I noticed it when I put new, straight bunks on my trailer for my Bonefisher. Hummm, at first I thought it was the boards, nope the hull.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My 1975 18SF has all flat panels- no wedge, hook, or rocker.
Made it easier to add on hull extension. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd say go for it and try it, id cut the transom off and stretch it there. ppl do it all the time on downeast hulls so why couldn't you do it? go for it bud its only fiberglass.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That makes a lot of sense. Did they have any rocker in the center part of the hull? I wonder if Moesly was unique in that approach? Probably not, since folks have been trying to go faster in powerboats since the invention of the IC engine!
__________________
'72 SeaFari/150E-Tec/Hermco Bracket, owned since 1975. http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z...Part2019-1.jpg |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|