Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > General Discussion > General
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-06-2006, 06:35 PM
abl1111 abl1111 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: long island, ny
Posts: 1,053
Default Re: 1974 23 SF I/O Desirability


I have a 23' Tsunami w/ a 5.7 I/O and a Bravo 3 - SWEET ride ! The I/O box is no problem for me, although if it were not there it would be even better. With regard to maintenance - w/ an I/O you can still do some DIY maintenance - the new O/B's are not even for the mechanically inclined.

So, let's see - more cockpit room w/ an o/b. Less aft weight - could be a pro or a con ? O/B better shallow water access. O/B - do not have to keep the outdrive in the water (corrosion). O/B good fuel consumption too. O/B more difficult to work on, I/O easier, and I/O handles much better - especially Bravo 3, I/O very fuel efficient - and quiet ( a buddy of mine has a Yamaha 250 HPDI on a 25' Parker - it is loud ! I/O closed transom.

Overall the only thing that really bothers me about having an I/O is that I hate leaving the drive in the water for the season. And, I have to watch out for certain shallow spots. However, I feel that the weight of the motor, centered nice and low, gives me a very nice smooth, dry ride.

At the end of the day, you can't go wrong either way. I was always an O/B guy for all the obvious reasons but now that I own an I/O - something I SWORE I would never do - I'm happy with it !

Good luck
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-07-2006, 03:24 PM
nestorpr nestorpr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Kendale Lakes, FL
Posts: 868
Default Re: 1974 23 SF I/O Desirability

I've owned all 3 types, inboard, outboard and i/o and I like the i/o because it offers the best of both worlds in one package. It's more manouverable than an inboard and the thrust line can be altered where the inboard thrusts at an angle and is not as efficient, it's usually more economical than an outboard and a lot less noisy than most, especially at high speeds. A lot of the parts can be found at auto parts stores at much cheaper prices than for an outboard which are usually only offered by the manufacturer at exorbitant prices. To me the disadvantage of the engine box is not as bad as a big outboard hanging out the back with the powerhead right in the way and with the new fad of installing outboards on those transom brackets, you loose the whole transom area to the engine(s) and bracket. I've lost too many big marlin because of an outboard in the way when trying to board it so, for me, an i/o is the better choice. On CC boats, an i/o on a jackshaft with the engine under the console would be even better, clean cockpit just like an inboard but with shallow water capability (with the oudrive raised)!
__________________
Boatless again!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft