Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > General Discussion > Performance
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-04-2009, 01:15 PM
Bushwacker Bushwacker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: N. Palm Beach, Fl.
Posts: 2,456
Default Re: motor weights, too much?

Sound like you're looking at 4 strokes. Don't know what your objective is but if you want speed, stay with a 2-stroke! Be advised that weights on those motors are really closer to 500 lbs because the quoted weights are DRY weights! When you add 6-7 qts of lube and gear oil that's another 35-40 lbs! I also understand they don't include weight of the cowling, since that's not on the motor when they hang 'em from a scale!

I agree with Egg that the 150 4 strokes you mentioned are way too heavy. You have to remember that Moesly designed the 19 Bowrider and 20' hulls for 300 lb motors! As you get over that, you're progressively screwing up the balance of the boat, and I'd think the smaller 18 is even more critical.

The heaviest 4 stroke I'd consider is the 140 Zuke and I think it's a little heavy for an 18. Suggest you send a PM to Snookerd, as he had one with a V-4 2 stroke and his dad has one with a 140 Zuke. I believe he feels it'd ride better with a lighter motor.
__________________
'72 SeaFari/150E-Tec/Hermco Bracket, owned since 1975.
http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z...Part2019-1.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-04-2009, 05:41 PM
Snookerd Snookerd is offline
Founding Father
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Bradenton, FL.
Posts: 2,658
Default Re: motor weights, too much?

Quote:
The heaviest 4 stroke I'd consider is the 140 Zuke and I think it's a little heavy for an 18. Suggest you send a PM to Snookerd, as he had one with a V-4 2 stroke and his dad has one with a 140 Zuke. I believe he feels it'd ride better with a lighter motor.
Bushwacker is correct. Only motors I would put on an 18SF to have the intended weight for the boat is below 380lbs. My family has the 140 Zuke on their 18SF and it does fine, but it isn't close to being self-bailing.
__________________
Snookerd
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-04-2009, 06:43 PM
2182 2182 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: charleston, SC
Posts: 209
Default Re: motor weights, too much?

damn you guys are good. thanks a lot. i love all the info on this site. on the bright side we all run boats w/ 20 year old hulls so the big $ item is the motor. 140 zuke sounds good, you really think i can get 45 out of it? i do like to go fast but 45 is doable (clean bottom, no bottom paint). as far as the 2 stroke v. 4 stroke, ive always (last 3 anyway) ran 2 stroke mercs and had good luck, but im thinking of going new and i dont like the opti, its gotten too much bad press. ive heard they worked out the kinks but id rather not be the lab rat for it. also, really nobody is running yammis on their seacrafts? all the bigger boats i fish run the hpdi and love it. just a weight issue?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-05-2009, 04:01 PM
zach zach is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Atlanta / Ft. Lauderdale
Posts: 131
Default Re: motor weights, too much?

Quote:
i dont like the opti, its gotten too much bad press. ive heard they worked out the kinks but id rather not be the lab rat for it.
Not sure what you're reading, but Optis have been some of the most reliable engines out there over the last 5 years. You're correct, the earlier ones had some bugs but those were worked out by the 2003 models. As mentioned above, if you want speed/performance, stick with the 2-stroke. You can get 200 horsepower from the e-tec with the same weight as the 140 suzuki.

Reason no one on here is running Yamaha is because the 200 hpdi is the only 2 stroke they make for saltwater (475 lbs) and the f150 is substantially heavier (466 lbs) than the suzuki 140.

For what its worth, I repowered my 20 last year and, after extensive research, settled on the Opti. Only 80 hours on her so far, but it hasn't skipped a beat.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-05-2009, 07:38 PM
2182 2182 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: charleston, SC
Posts: 209
Default Re: motor weights, too much?

what size opti on your 20? the e-tec 200 really weighs the same? that sure wouldnt hurt my topend, just my wallet...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-04-2009, 09:16 PM
asdfhood asdfhood is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 39
Default Re: motor weights, too much?

I bought Snookerd's 1987 ( I think) 18. It had a Yamaha 130 4 cyl 2 strk. I replaced it with the same. It took some searching but i found one with low hrs priced right. I think some will agree that this is the ideal power for this hull. I am in Columbia and fish Charleston and Lake Moultrie. The Mercury Tower of Power sounds good but every one I found was very long of tooth.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-04-2009, 11:15 PM
eggsuckindog eggsuckindog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Tampa
Posts: 2,354
Default Re: motor weights, too much?

Look at the new Etec 115 HO, will be right at 125 HP and has the Lightning gear case which is smaller than the 130, it should have a bit more zip from fuel mapping and stuff since its a kinda go fast motor. Still think its about 369#, but a 100+ pounds is a ton on the transom, that should give 45 easy.
__________________
Any way you measure it - dumbass is expensive
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-04-2009, 11:21 PM
asdfhood asdfhood is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 39
Default Re: motor weights, too much?

Sorry, I ended the prev post too soon. I was going to bring up the 115 E=Tech, and also the 130, or 135 Etek. I seriously considered the 115 but boat was already regged for Yamaha and I found a good motor at considerably less $$. But there is always tomorrow and Evinrude seems to loom large on the horizion (sp?)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-05-2009, 12:06 AM
McGillicuddy McGillicuddy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: 32.77 N, 117.01 W
Posts: 2,184
Default Re: motor weights, too much?

I totally concur w/ESD. I'd like to hear some Merc heads thoughts on the Optimax. From what I gather the bugs are long gone, and the 115 would be a nice match. That being said that 115 E-tec or the 115HO and 130 are just too cool.

I think the optis weigh in at about 375 lbs and the white (salt-water) E-tecs 390lbs (according to '09 brochure) will both get you high 30s to mid 40s and still avg. 5mpg. I would be sold on either If I had the lumber, er money...
__________________
there's no such thing as normal anymore...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-05-2009, 10:59 AM
76Red18 76Red18 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NORTH FORT MYERS, FL.
Posts: 671
Default Re: motor weights, too much?

OMC Eagle series is the perfect power/weight ratio for the 18; 150hp @ 376 lbs. Theres still a few around worth rebuilding. If you want to see 50+ you can do thisOMC Eagle Project
__________________
" I'm the one thats got to die when its time for me to die; so let me live my life, the way I want to".
J. M. Hendrix
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft