Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > General Discussion > Repairs/Mods.
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-17-2011, 11:40 PM
pianewman pianewman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 165
Default Re: re power

Okay, now it's beginning to make sense to me. I thought I had been cured of the "Seacraft" addiction since 1989, when my dad sold his 1974 Tsunami. We wondered at the time why there were so many Seacraft owners that were adding trimtabs, as we found the concept unnecessary.
Fast forward to 2010. My dad, at 87, has a relapse, buys a 1973 20' CC, with a heavy Johnson, repowers with a 2008 Merc 150 (I think 450lbs. +), and we wonder why the aft of the boat sits so low in the water!
Thanks for the clarification. Now I know why the move toward trimtabs to assist getting on plane, etc.
Are the fins that attach to the cavitation plate of any value? Sure would be a lot less fuss than installing trimtabs.
Quote:
Carl Moesly designed the 20' hull for the I-6 Merc, which weighed less than 300 lbs! Think about it. The further you go above that, the more you screw up the CG, which means the boat won't ride as well as designed, and your min planning speed will increase, which is a big deal if you plan to run offshore in rough seas. Also keep in mind that the SeaCraft hull is lighter, narrower and much more efficient than the average modern deep V, which means it doesn't NEED as much power as most modern 20' boats. The 20' hull will start to go airborne in seas over 3' at speeds over 20 kts, so unless you're into racing on flat water, a 150 is more than enough power for a 20 if you run offshore very much!
__________________
1971 20' Seafari, 3.0 Merc. I/O
Peterson 1819 Aluminum single axle trailer
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-18-2011, 12:12 AM
Fr. Frank Fr. Frank is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Shalimar, Florida
Posts: 2,265
Default Re: re power

Quote:
Okay, now it's beginning to make sense to me. ...
Thanks for the clarification. Now I know why the move toward trimtabs to assist getting on plane, etc.
Are the fins that attach to the cavitation plate of any value?
Yes, those fins help. Even more effective is the Hydro-Shield, which mounts to the skeg, so that it is always exerting influence on trim, whereas with the Davis Whale tail, or Stingray Hydrofoil, or Attwood Hydrolizer, they are all exerting minimal influence when on plane, and exert almost no influence when on plane and trimmed up beyond neutral trim angle.

The Hydro-Shield also very effectively protects your prop in shallow water.
__________________
Common Sense is learning from your mistakes. Wisdom is learning from the other guy's mistakes.

Fr. Frank says:
Jesus liked fishing, too. He even walked on water to get to the boat!

Currently without a SeaCraft
(2) Pompano 12' fishing kayaks
'73 Cobia 18' prototype "Casting Skiff", 70hp Mercury
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft