![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Anyway of finding out and confirming the Etec 90 inline is actually 10-15hp more than its rated ? At 335lbs its the lightest in that power range.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The NAEBM requires that advertised HP be within + 10% of actual HP, and BRP seems to be sandbagging on most of the E-TECs by up to the full 10%. The I-3 90 is basically 1/2 of the 2.6L V-6, which is made in 4 different HP ratings, i.e., 135, 150, 175, and 200 HP. The HP/Torque curve for the "150", which was published in a brochure a few years ago, shows it actually producing 165 hp at the prop. I suspect that the "90" is actually 95-100 HP at the prop. What's more important is the mid-range torque that you need to get on plane quickly; all 2-strokes are typically much stronger in the mid-range than comparable 4-strokes, even if they're about the same at max rpm.
__________________
'72 SeaFari/150E-Tec/Hermco Bracket, owned since 1975. http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z...Part2019-1.jpg |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
The 90 E-Tec has a very flat torque curve and pulls like a John Deere. The 115's are a little more pipe in the mid-range - I also have two of those. I believe 3 three cylinder motors are harmonically balance and are super durable with few Hot Spots. the new G-2 Etec's are actually two three cylinder motors grafted together with a common crank - Starboard Injectors, Port Exhaust on both banks. that should tell you something. That being said - EVERYBODY MAKES VERY GOOD MOTORS THESE DAYS. Find you best local mechanic and pick a color. It all good, Bro'! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Can you pleas elaborate on what you mean by few "Hot Spots" ? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[QUOTE=sidelock;241201] . . . Can you please elaborate on what you mean by a few "Hot Spots"[QUOTE]
Before the advent of the G2 E-TEC, the exhaust ports on all V-4 & V-6 2 strokes dumped into the V between cylinder banks, creating what could be considered a "hot spot" that required extra cooling, which I suspect is what Terry was referring to. The inline engines and the G2 E-TEC do not have this problem. Regarding fuel consumption differences between the 90 hp Zuke and E-TEC, I suspect that the Zuke will be 10-15% better at cruise, and the E-TEC will be 25-30% better at low speed (below ~1800 rpm) when it's in the stratified charge mode, so the overall average mpg will be very similar on both. For example, my 150 E-TEC burns 0.5 gph @ 1000 rpm & 5mph (=10 mpg) and gets ~3.8-4.0 mpg at cruise; my overall average when carrying a heavy cruising load (2 big coolers, groceries and gear, extra H20 and gas) is typically about 4.4 mpg. A few years ago I circumnavigated S. Florida via the Okeechobee waterway, Florida Bay and the ICW, running almost 700 miles and burning 158.5 gal of fuel and about 1.5 gal of oil for an average of 4.4 mpg. I've also made the 90 mile run up to Sebastian for CSC gatherings 3 times and I typically burn about 20 gallons each way. Another good resource if you have any questions on the E-TEC is the Owners Forum, which is supported by some very knowledgeable techs. The other items to consider are maintenance costs and proximity to a good dealer. As Terry says, nobody makes a bad motor these days!
__________________
'72 SeaFari/150E-Tec/Hermco Bracket, owned since 1975. http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z...Part2019-1.jpg |
![]() |
|
|