Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > General Discussion > SeaCraft Photos
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-29-2009, 06:22 AM
Caymanboy Caymanboy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ft Laud, Florida
Posts: 771
Default Re: I also fell for the low used boat prices

Zach,
Yes I will be cruising the show, all w/e, 4 str is nice for what it is, wouldn't be my #1 choice. Don't have the top end #'s yet. Soon come.
__________________
1972 20' SeaCraft SF, F200XB
1974 40' Eagle
www.parkeryacht.com
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-29-2009, 08:54 AM
stoney stoney is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Toms River, N.J.& Elkton,Md
Posts: 148
Default Re: I also fell for the low used boat prices

I beleive it is better than my seacraft in the rock and roll department. That could be because of the bare weight of 4400 lb, or because it is longer. My 23 seacraft is a light weight. Drifting in short 3-4ft chop can wear you down. My friend scott has a 1977 23 seacraft that is much heavier and sits 2-3" lower in the water. It does not roll as much as my seacraft. I went out barnegat inlet with seas at 5-7ft just to see how the Seavee handles. The boat handles is quite nicely. The extra 6 foot in length rally smoothes out the ride.
__________________
73 23 SF 2004 200 HP Yami OX66 Best boat I owned!
2002 29 Seavee twin 200 yami's
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft