Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > Recovered Threads
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 01-08-2015, 08:01 PM
Andrew Hill Andrew Hill is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Boynton
Posts: 28
Default Depth

Quote:
Originally Posted by DonV View Post
Yepper!! I have the 1000w B164 20 degree and it's a very good unit. However as Moose said watching a 3 3/4" hole saw drilling through your hull really kicks in the pucker power!!
DonV,

How deep are you reading until your unit goes blank?
Running the b164 also, with the garmin 740s. Getting about 800. Was hoping to drop on some rosies
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-08-2015, 08:21 PM
ocuyler ocuyler is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 44.41 -75.79
Posts: 1,490
Default

If you choose a "shoot through" transducer without temperature, what is the downside to not having that data other than determining "shrinkage" factor?
__________________
Otto
And yes, I still believe in the four boat theory...
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-08-2015, 10:34 PM
DonV DonV is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Apollo Beach or Islamorada
Posts: 3,488
Send a message via ICQ to DonV
Default

I have the Raymarine DSM300 module with my old clunker C120. I have trolled at 1400' and seen the contour of the bottom very well, that's as deep as I've had it. Can't say I would be able to pick out a swordfish or anything like that, never tried to zoom in to the bottom for rosies or the really deep guys.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-09-2015, 05:13 PM
kmoose kmoose is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ocala, Florida
Posts: 1,817
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ocuyler View Post
If you choose a "shoot through" transducer without temperature, what is the downside to not having that data other than determining "shrinkage" factor?
Up to 30% loss signal loss on transmit and receive. Not a real problem in shallow water up to 150, but definately a problem in deeper water with units under 1000 watts. I once had it both ways on a Paramount superfish and ran a 200/50 glued inside. I did'nt know what I was missing until I transom mounted it. The biggest return issue when it was glued inside was the deminished fish show return.
__________________
[b]The Moose is Loose !
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-06-2016, 10:35 AM
Highwayman Highwayman is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 40
Default Transducer mounting location

Still rigging my 23 CC and about ready to install a pair of Garmin GT51M-THP transducers. My concern is the best hull location. They seem really large for a 23' boat . I like the second step location but my concern is will this location effect the water flow to the prop with a single outboard mounted on a twin Hermco bracket?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-06-2016, 01:18 PM
shine shine is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 597
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Highwayman View Post
I like the second step location but my concern is will this location effect the water flow to the prop with a single outboard mounted on a twin Hermco bracket?
If you mount outside the first step, the water will be aerated, no bueno.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-06-2016, 05:23 PM
kmoose kmoose is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ocala, Florida
Posts: 1,817
Default

Sell one and mount a single dead center of the keel. In all reality you could of gone with a transom mount and mounted it right next to the drain plug. That is where I mounted mine and it doesn't bother the motor whatsoever. Your bracket is much longer than mine so there would be no issue. I wanted to go thru hull as well but I didn't want to cut the center stringer but that would be the best place and I will make accommodations on my next build.

If you go with both thru hulls you will likely have to go with fairing blocks to get them low enough in the water.
Attached Images
 
__________________
[b]The Moose is Loose !
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-06-2016, 10:19 PM
Highwayman Highwayman is offline
Recovered
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 40
Default

The transducers come with fairing blocks that can be cut to the angle of the dead rise. I would be concerned with the first step mount in that it may cause cavitation. Shine said outside the first step becomes aerated. I also have reservations about cutting the center stringer. I may be forced to go with a transom mount if I can't figure out how to make these work. Thought it would be nice to have down view, side view, and chirp in one set of thru hull mounted transducers. Thanks for your input.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-07-2016, 07:27 PM
kmoose kmoose is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ocala, Florida
Posts: 1,817
Default

You still have all of those with a single transom mount and with your bracket it will have a clear view to both sides.
__________________
[b]The Moose is Loose !
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-08-2016, 04:12 AM
thehermit thehermit is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Chatham, MA
Posts: 777
Default

Moose. Do you think you could have mounted your Gt51 half way up the last panel?
__________________
__________________________________________________ ________________
1974 23SF
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft