2007 Etec 175 Questions

[jtharmo]

Originally Posted by Rybones

I would be looking at 32" over all. What do you mean by "buck hard"?

Porpoising if I use no trim tab at all. I don’t have a fine touch with trim so I’m sure I start with too much until on plane. Then I trim engine and tabs up for best speed. Don’t get me wrong, it’s more then manageable. I just can’t firewall-it without thinking like the old boat.

[Rybones]

Gotcha, and that makes perfect sense.

[Rybones]

Stood the engine up and mounted on a homemade stand the other day. Wired it and then fired it on the first turn of the key. After a small ground issue. Was VERY happy about that because I wasn't happy that I bought an engine from someone upstate without hearing it run, and let it sit for 2 weeks eating at my soul as to the soundness of my actions. But it sounds great and is soo quiet compared to my otherwise flawless 94' 150 looper (Shhhhh. I haven't told her yet that we are going to have to find her a new home), and I have the etec Tech guy coming today to put the computer on it and do a compression test. If anyone sees this in time, any suggestions about questions to ask or things to look for? There is one very peculiar thing though, the EMM has 200HO etched into it. I know the 200 EMM could be fine for the 175 because both are the 60 degree block, but he 200 HO is the 90 degree block..... (Shifty eyed emoji)

[erebus]

Originally Posted by Rybones

There is one very peculiar thing though, the EMM has 200HO etched into it. I know the 200 EMM could be fine for the 175 because both are the 60 degree block, but he 200 HO is the 90 degree block..... (Shifty eyed emoji)

Did a quick lookup in the BRP parts finder and the part number for the EMM (0586707) is the same for the 2007 175, the 200 and the 200HO.
If that eases your peace of mind any.

[Rybones]

That's an outstanding bit of info Erebus! Because even my mechanic that was on it today was a little stumped with that one. But I really can't thank you enough for that information. Overall everything seems good with the engine, few glitches, need to check water pump, although only 5 hours on the impeller apparently it's not functioning or efficiently enough. Hopefully it's just improperly seated seals. Missing Deutsch connector for oil tank connector. Missing plastic flywheel-EMM and injector covers/shrouds. Missing latches in Cowling for both sides, only front is intact. (Erebus, as you likely know the name association, my future 23 with the mercury 400hp is to be named "PBR Streetgang".)

[erebus]

Originally Posted by Rybones

(Erebus, as you likely know the name association, my future 23 with the mercury 400hp is to be named "PBR Streetgang".)

[Topflitegraphics]

Rybones, I you don't mind me asking, how much did you get the E-tec for? I am looking for a good used motor for my 20MA and used e-tecs are rare around here. Seems like nobody ever sells them...

[Rybones]

TFG, I was/have been looking pretty diligently for more than a year they are rare, I don't think you are going to find one for less than $5k and you have to act very quick. I have seen a few 175's and almost no 200's (25"). The 250's and 300's are far more common because of higher end repowers of twins. I have been looking for the 200 small block 60 degree because of the lighter weight as the 200HO is the larger block or 90 degrees and 100lbs heavier like the 225's and 250's. I still want a 200, but apparently I cant have one.

[Bushwacker]

Originally Posted by Rybones

. . . If anyone sees this in time, any suggestions about questions to ask or things to look for? ..... (Shifty eyed emoji)

If you haven’t already checked it, there is a small cone shaped fine mesh filter in the vapor separator tank where the fuel return line attaches. Some dealers don’t even know about it because it wasn’t shown in the early parts books, so they often don’t check it. I ran my motor for 6+ years on E10 fuel and that filter clogged up. There were two 10 micron filters between the tank and that filter on my boat, so the black tar-like stuff evidently came from the fuel lines that were being dissolved by the E10 in the fuel! (I believe they upgraded fuel lines after my motor was built in 2006, so if an older motor, it might be worth upgrading to the latest lines.) If it’s clogged the same stuff will also be in the injectors. (Fuel Injector Man in Venice, Fl. has a special set up for flow testing and cleaning E-TEC injectors.) Easiest way to diagnose this problem is to check HP fuel pump discharge pressure at the Schrader valve fitting on the pump. It normally runs only about 35 psi (same simple Carter pump as used in most port injected cars!), but mine was 65 psi and I was having a problem with rough running at 900 rpm, but only when cold.) Since I had the 7 year warranty, BRP replaced all 6 injectors (worth about $2400!) and the motor was running like new with about 900 hrs on it when SSPBill bought it. Except for the fuel lines, the E-TEC injectors & pumps appear to be very tolerant to E10 fuel, but I only ran Rec 90 fuel after that!

If you have to change that filter in the vapor separator tank inlet, be very careful to minimize force on the nipple where it lives, because it’s easy to break off that plastic nipple! There is a little tang on the Oetiker clamps; if you cut it off with a Dremel tool, the clamps are easily removed.

One other comment regarding the 135/150/175/200 hp 2.7L E-TEC power ratings. They are all basically the same powerhead, but BRP appears to be very conservative on the power ratings on the lower HP versions. NAEBM requires that true HP be within +10% of advertised rating, so true HP on the 135/150 is about 10% more than advertised, and maybe +5% on the 175 and maybe 0 to -5% on the 200! So bottom line is that the lower HP motors are surprisingly stong and if you’re looking for a used motor, they may be a much better “bang for the buck” than the 200! Your WOT speed with a 200 may only be 2- 5 mph more than you’d get with a 150 or 175! Intake and exhaust port location (analogous to cam timing on a 4-stroke) and exhaust tuning tweaks often used to get max hp on 2-strokes may also adversely affect mid-range torque, so engines with a lower hp rating may actually have MORE mid-range torque that you want for getting on plane with a heavy load or hanging on plane at lower speed in rough seas! My experience is that a strong mid-range power band is typically more useful and desirable than a few mph at WOT.

[erebus]

Originally Posted by Bushwacker

My experience is that a strong mid-range power band is typically more useful and desirable than a few mph at WOT.

This.
All this.