Classic SeaCraft Community

Classic SeaCraft Community (http://www.classicseacraft.com/community/index.php)
-   Recovered Threads (http://www.classicseacraft.com/community/forumdisplay.php?f=13)
-   -   1984 23cc (http://www.classicseacraft.com/community/showthread.php?t=28913)

dginge 08-01-2017 04:25 PM

1984 23cc
 
Is 1984 a good or bad year? Have my eyes on one. My 1977 was a tank. Someone refresh my memory. Thanks

kmoose 08-01-2017 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dginge (Post 253068)
Is 1984 a good or bad year? Have my eyes on one. My 1977 was a tank. Someone refresh my memory. Thanks

Remember the 1978 PintoStang.... well, not that bad. :D I believe it is an SCI hull. There is talk of some select hulls coming out of the mold with a hook but I am not that knowledgeable as some of the vets here who should be piping in shortly to give you all the details.

dginge 08-01-2017 05:25 PM

Thanks. Keep em coming

Bushwacker 08-02-2017 10:56 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by kmoose (Post 253070)
Remember the 1978 PintoStang.... well, not that bad. :D I believe it is an SCI hull. There is talk of some select hulls coming out of the mold with a hook but I am not that knowledgeable as some of the vets here who should be piping in shortly to give you all the details.

There was one 23 mold that SeaCraft Industries inherited when they bought Potter's bankrupt company that had with a slight hook in it on the center panel on port side just forward of transom. Potter warned them not to use it but they apparently did on at least one 23 Sceptre I looked at. (See pic below.) It's probably less than 1/8" deep and could be easily fixed, but it's something I'd check for on any SCI hull.

dginge 08-02-2017 12:15 PM

Thanks so much. Very cool.

Chrismacholz 08-04-2017 10:11 PM

I have a 1987 and it's a fantastic boat. If you can get past the stigma that it's not a Potter you will enjoy it. People tend to over analyze this stuff - I know I did when I was shopping around. I prefer the layout of the post-potter hulls anyway. The transom is much cleaner and you have a bigger cockpit because of it. These later boats also have bigger gas tanks and better scupper layout.

77SceptreOB 08-04-2017 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bushwacker (Post 253081)
There was one 23 mold that SeaCraft Industries inherited when they bought Potter's bankrupt company that had with a slight hook in it on the center panel on port side just forward of transom. Potter warned them not to use it but they apparently did on at least one 23 Sceptre I looked at. (See pic below.) It's probably less than 1/8" deep and could be easily fixed, but it's something I'd check for on any SCI hull.

Would that minor amount of dimensional difference really make a noticeable performance difference? What is the net result in the ride?

kmoose 08-05-2017 06:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 77SceptreOB (Post 253164)
Would that minor amount of dimensional difference really make a noticeable performance difference? What is the net result in the ride?

Yes it will but the fix is so easy it's not worth considering as a disqualifier.

kmoose 08-05-2017 06:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chrismacholz (Post 253163)
I have a 1987 and it's a fantastic boat. If you can get past the stigma that it's not a Potter you will enjoy it. People tend to over analyze this stuff - I know I did when I was shopping around. I prefer the layout of the post-potter hulls anyway. The transom is much cleaner and you have a bigger cockpit because of it. These later boats also have bigger gas tanks and better scupper layout.

I agree, I would have no issue going with an SCI hull. some say Potters are built like tanks but is there any real evidence of that? Maybe, but that isn't always a good thing if more glass was used beyond what was structurally needed. I can also tell you Potter hulls aren't perfect. When you dig as deep as I have into then you will certainly find shortcomings in certain areas of construction.

otterhound 08-05-2017 11:16 AM

I totally agree with Kmoose and the above statement. On my 78 Potter 18 I had to replace the bow eye last year. When I finally got an access hole cut in the liner I found out that the glass was over 1/2" thick in the bow. In general our 18 is a very heavy boat. That being said though I will definitely take one that's too heavy over one that's too light any day of the week.
Rod


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:54 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft