![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Until I get the Web Cam shooting the boat floating in the canal, CSC is a hands down winner for work distractions [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]!
Procrastinate now, don't put it off. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
__________________
Snookerd |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is there a "BEACH" behind Your Boat? [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img] or pool [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] or saloon [img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img] or ,Oh well We'll Wait! [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Tug [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]
__________________
http://www.frenzie.com/frenzielogoline.GIF www.frenzie.com http://www.frenzie.com/custom.htm "Classic SeaCraft" Lures 1983_seacraft_master_angler.]htm My wife and I had words, But I didn't get to use mine."?" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://www.e-tecinfonet.org/id3.html
http://continuouswave.com/ubb/Forum4/HTML/003990.html This a very interesting discussion on engines, including the ETEC. Check out the boats and motors on the 1st link. I think with the figures I am seeing, the 250 hp ETEC is more efficent than the 225 on a 3500# hull. Like I have said in the past, I will run my 1989 200 Merc til it drops, then I will consider the 250 ETEC for a repower option. Hopefully I don't have to do that very soon. With the price of gas that would be a 30% saving on gas from I am now.
__________________
Gary |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|