Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > General Discussion > Performance
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-23-2005, 05:49 PM
Fr. Frank Fr. Frank is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Shalimar, Florida
Posts: 2,265
Default Re: re-powering

The gear ratio in the Alpha One drive you already have will probably not be the same as you'll need with a V8. This problem is easily solved by changing propellors. Unfortunately, you can't just "drop in" a V8. You will need to change everything from the gimbal housing upward. Same problem, by the way, for any engine that doesn't use that same Mercruiser big-block 4 cylinder.

That being said, that big-block four cylinder is available in factory versions up to 190 hp, and I have even see a Wellcraft Airslot 24' with twin "470" mercruisers that had been outfitted with Paxton superchargers. The owner had gotten them off a couple of factory supercharged AMC Gremlins. (No, I don't know why AMC offered a supercharged Gremlin} He claimed 220 hp from each engine, and said he had over 200 hrs since the install, running them "8% under-driven", whatever that means.

If cost is not a major issue, or at least not the overwhelming issue, I TOTALLY agree with Brian, go with the diesels.
Here's something people often overlook about diesels: At a given horsepower, a diesel will produce 20 - 50% more thrust/torque than an equal horsepower gasoline engine.

For instance (going aviation here) a Cessna 172 with a 180 hp six cylinder gasoline engine will have almost exactly the same performance characteristics as the same aircraft equipped with a new 120 hp four cylinder aviation diesel engine, and yet the diesel will use just about exactly half the fuel at cruising speeds, and about 15% less fuel at maximum speeds. That changeover to diesel power, while expensive, effectively increases the cruising range of that aircraft by more than 75%, from 720 nm at max weight, to over 1250 nm at max weight.The same principles apply for marine use.

The question you need to ask is, do you want to spend the up-front money for the repower with diesels.
__________________
Common Sense is learning from your mistakes. Wisdom is learning from the other guy's mistakes.

Fr. Frank says:
Jesus liked fishing, too. He even walked on water to get to the boat!

Currently without a SeaCraft
(2) Pompano 12' fishing kayaks
'73 Cobia 18' prototype "Casting Skiff", 70hp Mercury
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-23-2005, 10:39 PM
Briguy Briguy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Sarasota, Fl
Posts: 976
Default Re: re-powering

Just a far flung guess but the Merc Diesel package will probably cost 12k-14k with outdrive. I know Merc sells the 120hp with drive for 9k. A diesel package in a SC is my wet dream. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
__________________
Capt. Brian

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-24-2005, 09:16 AM
bobyn bobyn is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3
Default Re: re-powering

Fr Frank, Scott and Brian, thanks for the replies. You have given me something to think about- especially the diesel option-with gas so high, it is food for thought. If I choose that route, do you think a Mercruiser diesel pkg would fit the existing transom cutout? Or is surgery required in your opinion? Again thanks for the feedback, Bob
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-24-2005, 10:25 PM
Tarpun Tarpun is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ormond Beach, Florida
Posts: 187
Default Re: re-powering

These days diesel fuel is more expensive than gas by about ten percent.In fact in my area it's been more for the last three years. Thats at the service station. I'm not sure about marina prices. Diesel routine maintainence runs more also with generally twice the oil capacity and more expensive oil and fuel filters. Plus the greater initial cost. All that being said the increased torque, safety, and better range make it a tough choice. Another plus for the diesel is that a lot of it's increased initial cost may be recouped by an increase in resale when you sell. For me it would boil down to the amount of use. The more hours I put on in a season the more I'd vote for diesel.
__________________
Tarpun
1972 20 Seafari
1977 23 Savage
1980 20'Master Angler

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-25-2005, 01:05 AM
nestorpr nestorpr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Kendale Lakes, FL
Posts: 868
Default Re: re-powering

Besides the Cummins-Mercruiser outfit check out the Volvo Penta and the GM offers.
__________________
Boatless again!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-25-2005, 04:34 PM
Briguy Briguy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Sarasota, Fl
Posts: 976
Default Re: re-powering

Bob,

Only Mercury can tell you if a new motor/drive will fit without cutting. Diesel is $20c cheeper a gallon where I buy fuel.
__________________
Capt. Brian

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-25-2005, 10:58 PM
Fr. Frank Fr. Frank is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Shalimar, Florida
Posts: 2,265
Default Re: re-powering

The transom cut-out is the same. Engine mounts may have to be fabricated, though. Not a big deal. The current Mercruiser/Cummins or larger (240 hp & up) Mercruiser/Yanmar combo's are supposed to be "bolt in" replacements. (Just for the record, though, there really ain't no such thing.)
Volvo Penta has 16 different diesel sterndrives ranging from 130 to 350 hp, and ranging from $18.7K to $33.4K
For Mercruiser package prices look here:
http://www.dougrussell.com/Products/...=70&Category=6
Doug Russell Marine Diesel sterndrive package pricing
__________________
Common Sense is learning from your mistakes. Wisdom is learning from the other guy's mistakes.

Fr. Frank says:
Jesus liked fishing, too. He even walked on water to get to the boat!

Currently without a SeaCraft
(2) Pompano 12' fishing kayaks
'73 Cobia 18' prototype "Casting Skiff", 70hp Mercury
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-02-2005, 11:41 PM
afernand afernand is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: miami florida
Posts: 73
Default Re: re-powering

Fr Frank (and all ClassicSC members): if one removes an I/O 165 HP in-line 6 cyl engine from a 23' SC, what would be a comparable replacement outboard engine, on a bracket? Thanks you for your comments, aaf
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-03-2005, 11:27 AM
FELLOW-SHIP FELLOW-SHIP is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cooper City, Fl
Posts: 1,798
Default Re: re-powering

I would go with either a single 225-250 two stroke with or without a bracket, or a 250 4 stroke, or twin 130 with a flotation bracket.
FellowShip [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-03-2005, 02:50 PM
Sleeto Sleeto is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Wickford, RI
Posts: 185
Default Re: re-powering

After much research, I just bought a 250 hp Suzuki 4 stroke for my 23' CC. It was a toss up between the Evinrude E-Tec and the Suzy, but the 6 year warranty on the Suzy made the difference. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]
__________________
Paul, 1989 23' SC CC 250 hp Suzuki Four Stroke on Stainless Marine bracket
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft