![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
just for reference, I know someone who spent close to $40K redoing a 20' that was older than the boat you are looking at [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img]
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Receipts say the owner spent 20K on upgrades. Hope that doesn't mean I'll spend another 20.
__________________
Barefoot serpents too |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sounds reasonable. Get us some pics so we can do an internet apprasial for you [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
strick
__________________
"I always wanted to piss in the Rhine" (General George Patton upon entering Germany) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JWB,
If the boat is truly as good as it sounds in your post, then it's a great deal for the money. I would say the only concerns at this point are age/condition of the fuel tank and condition of the deck (soft spots, etc.). Those 140's are very reliable engines, so you shouldn't have any trouble with them, especially if the drives are new too. Regardless of the outboard vs I/O debate, the only down side that I see is the amount of deck space the engine box will eat up. A single I/O is one thing, but with twins there's virtually no walking room behind the console. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Are you going to take it for a ride or just whistle dixie? [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
__________________
Capt. Brian |
![]() |
|
|