![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
personal opinion but i would go with the 4 bbl. better fuel economy, performance maybe and that edelbrock is imo a better carb than the holley- for marine use anyway. I did the same thing as you mention on my old 351 i had in an old mako. was well worth the trade-off.
__________________
"Lifes too short to own an ugly boat" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Before you put it in I may checkout any additional HP items than just a carb. I would look into a different cam as well, its easy when its out of the boat and may give you another 40 to 50 HP, a 4bbl version may have come with a different one than the 2 bbl. anyway and I bet it did, thats a heavy boat you can't get toooo much HP in it. I would even go a high performance cam instead of just a standard manufactuer.
__________________
Any way you measure it - dumbass is expensive |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks all.I want as much power as possible,but i also want a smooth trolling speed out of it.
I'don't want to get too radical,and end up with an engine that idles like a race car. It's primary use,other than getting me to a fishing location quickly,will be to be able to troll at 2.5 to 3.5 mph smoothly for several hours at a time.
__________________
All this,just for a boat ride |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is a fuel injected engine worth the xtra? iam looking myself for a complete package.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Think about it. You want it to make max torque at around 3000 RPM. That will keep you out of the secondaries on the 4 Brl and give you decent fuel millage. Something in a RV style camshaft. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
They make cams that make the power all thru the RPM range, yes he would want one that makes it at the lower end.
__________________
Any way you measure it - dumbass is expensive |
![]() |
|
|