![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Fr. Frank.
So in your opinion does the hull without the reverse chine ride alittle better. Do you know if they have about the same degree in the V at the front. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Common Sense is learning from your mistakes. Wisdom is learning from the other guy's mistakes. Fr. Frank says: Jesus liked fishing, too. He even walked on water to get to the boat! Currently without a SeaCraft ![]() (2) Pompano 12' fishing kayaks '73 Cobia 18' prototype "Casting Skiff", 70hp Mercury |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Fr.Frank. I maybe getting ready to trade a cuddy GW i own now for a 83' 20SF. Then may buy a 72' hull that needs some work. Was just wondering which one to keep.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
While I like Grady's for their strength, sea-keeping ability and fishability, I would rather have either SeaCraft. As for the difference in the chine's on an '83 vs. a '72, I wouldn't choose a boat on just that basis. For instance, the '72 hull came only with a 20" transom, which is absolutely minimal with today's heavier motors; figure on redoing and raising the transom. If however, the very best possible ride is your goal, regardless of other modifications of repairs that may be necessary, then go for the '72 eventually. It may be, however, that you come to like the newer hull just fine. In that case, you're golden!
__________________
Common Sense is learning from your mistakes. Wisdom is learning from the other guy's mistakes. Fr. Frank says: Jesus liked fishing, too. He even walked on water to get to the boat! Currently without a SeaCraft ![]() (2) Pompano 12' fishing kayaks '73 Cobia 18' prototype "Casting Skiff", 70hp Mercury |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Either one I keep will have a make over this coming up winter. Enclosed transom, new raised floor, bracket, etc.. I had an 1984 23' Seacraft a couple years ago and redid it. It was documented on here under "1984 23 Floor Porject". Had to sell it due to the time (new wife, new baby.. ). Wish I had it back. I ended up raising the floor 3" to accomadate a 4-stroke later on. Want to get back to a Seacraft but with gas probably going back up this year and everything I want to stay with the 20SF this time around. Plus when I do a 23' agian it will have twins..
And the Grady is a good boat, just not for me. Thanks for the feed back.. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Definitely do the SeaCraft, you'll be part of a fraternity of people in "The Know" rather than being in the community college of Grady White. GW's are well made quality boats but don't really seem to perform with the top of the heap like their price tag the last thirty years warrants. Personally I think of GW like a fishing version of a SeaRay and if I never saw either again I'd be ok. They seem to do a lot of things well but none great. That being said the 19 to 22 tournament bowrider, especially bracketed is my favorite Grady. It doesn't matter which SC hull you go with it will perform much better than the Grady.
__________________
Thank goodness that in the scheme of things you are broke, powerlesss and inconsequential, because with the shortsighted alternatives and idealogy you have you'd be much worse than those you complain about. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Like I said I had a 23', 20' and my father has a 25' Seacraft. Its hard to beat the ride and the lines of the Seacraft. I always grew up calling the GW, "ditdot boats", cause every summer you would see countless dingbatters on shoals, getting towed, etc.. in a GW. They are definallty not worth the money to me. I got the GW cause of the cabin for the baby, but next summer he will be alittle older, and the GW usually has a good resell. Going on a cruise this weekend till the following weekend, so hopefully when I get back I will be a Seacraft owner once again.
![]() |
![]() |
|
|