Classic SeaCraft Community  

Go Back   Classic SeaCraft Community > General Discussion > Performance
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-10-2010, 09:33 AM
76Red18 76Red18 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NORTH FORT MYERS, FL.
Posts: 671
Default Re: I/O vs. OB

Properly set up, I would think there wouldn't be much difference. HP is HP. The lightest power source will be the fastest. What are the weights of a modern 250 hp outboard vs. a 250 i/o? Straight inboard is a different story because of inefficient drive angle. Not the fastest but probably the best ride.
__________________
" I'm the one thats got to die when its time for me to die; so let me live my life, the way I want to".
J. M. Hendrix
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-11-2010, 09:58 AM
Islandtrader Islandtrader is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Tarpon Capital Of The World
Posts: 2,122
Default Re: I/O vs. OB

Quote:
The lightest power source will be the fastest. What are the weights of a modern 250 hp outboard vs. a 250 i/o?
A 300 HP Mercruiser with Bravo Drv.900 #

A 300 Yamaha 4/s 800#.

So hundred pounds lighter, I bet the speed would be insignificant.

Remember I asked which would be faster, not which would be better

It is interesting getting everyone's opinion.

Ford or Chevy...Black or White!
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

"If You Done It...It Ain't Braggin"



my rebuild thread: http://www.classicseacraft.com/commu...ad.php?t=18594
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-11-2010, 06:50 PM
77SceptreOB 77SceptreOB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Columbia, SC.
Posts: 1,611
Default Re: I/O vs. OB

Quote:
A 300 HP Mercruiser with Bravo Drv.900 #


I had a 300hp Mercruiser (7.4L) which is a 454 ci Chevy block and a bravo 1 drive, It was way heavier than 900 #, all together it was close to 1300#.
__________________
1977 SeaCraft 23' Sceptre W/ Alum Tower & Yamaha 225
www.LouveredProductsUnlimited.com
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-11-2010, 09:43 PM
Blue_Heron Blue_Heron is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Gator Country
Posts: 1,416
Default Re: I/O vs. OB

Quote:
I had a 300hp Mercruiser (7.4L) which is a 454 ci Chevy block and a bravo 1 drive, It was way heavier than 900 #, all together it was close to 1300#.
I don't know the weight, but the current 300HP Mercruiser is a multi-port fuel injected 5.7 liter,(350ci) small block.
Dave
__________________
Blue Heron Boat Works
Reinventing the wheel, one spoke at a time.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-11-2010, 11:13 PM
Fr. Frank Fr. Frank is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Shalimar, Florida
Posts: 2,265
Default Re: I/O vs. OB

Quote:
Quote:
I had a 300hp Mercruiser (7.4L) which is a 454 ci Chevy block and a bravo 1 drive, It was way heavier than 900 #, all together it was close to 1300#.
I don't know the weight, but the current 300HP Mercruiser is a multi-port fuel injected 5.7 liter,(350ci) small block.
Dave
One site lists the complete package for a Mercruiser Magnum 5.7L 300 hp motor, transom mount and Bravo 2 drive at 1083 lbs.
__________________
Common Sense is learning from your mistakes. Wisdom is learning from the other guy's mistakes.

Fr. Frank says:
Jesus liked fishing, too. He even walked on water to get to the boat!

Currently without a SeaCraft
(2) Pompano 12' fishing kayaks
'73 Cobia 18' prototype "Casting Skiff", 70hp Mercury
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-12-2010, 10:09 AM
Islandtrader Islandtrader is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Tarpon Capital Of The World
Posts: 2,122
Default Re: I/O vs. OB

Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I had a 300hp Mercruiser (7.4L) which is a 454 ci Chevy block and a bravo 1 drive, It was way heavier than 900 #, all together it was close to 1300#.
I don't know the weight, but the current 300HP Mercruiser is a multi-port fuel injected 5.7 liter,(350ci) small block.
Dave
One site lists the complete package for a Mercruiser Magnum 5.7L 300 hp motor, transom mount and Bravo 2 drive at 1083 lbs.
A big block will always be heavier than a small block.

A small block will be heavier with a bravo 2 drive than a small block with a bravo 1.

My numbers come directly from Mercury (in brochure form).
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

"If You Done It...It Ain't Braggin"



my rebuild thread: http://www.classicseacraft.com/commu...ad.php?t=18594
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-11-2010, 10:28 PM
Blackfin26 Blackfin26 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Brewster, MA
Posts: 396
Default Re: I/O vs. OB

I'd say closer to 1300 lbs for the I/O myself...I think the 5.0 merc in my Hiliner and bravo 3 is about 1100 lbs. The new 300 Yamaha should be closer to 575 lbs not 800.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-15-2010, 06:44 PM
oldfielder oldfielder is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Miller Place, NY
Posts: 269
Default Re: I/O vs. OB

I top out around 4400, which is really the bottom of my 4400-4800 range, so I may be slightly overpropped but I don't let it bother me.
As far as weight/wind resistance, you are probably spot on. I added a simple three sided enclosure this year to the t-top for a little break in November from the wind and I've lost a bit off the top. It's amazing how that little item changes things in the wind-even when docking.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-17-2010, 12:46 PM
oldfielder oldfielder is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Miller Place, NY
Posts: 269
Default Re: I/O vs. OB

Hit 39.5 today with the windscreen up, two big guys and about 50 gallons of fuels and 4 big fluke on board
Was burning exactly 20 gph and running in a slight chop(which the boat seems to like best)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content © 2003-2013 ClassicSeacraft